JUST vs. PFM
JUST (Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - JUST tracks the JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JUST returned 13.24%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JUST charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.
Performance
JUST vs. PFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than PFM's 8.18% return.
JUST
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PFM
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
JUST vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUST Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 11.64% | 17.60% | 23.73% | 24.86% | -17.88% | 26.89% | 19.59% | 31.54% | -9.62% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 8.18% | 14.00% | 16.87% | 11.40% | -6.22% | 23.08% | 9.53% | 26.88% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between JUST and PFM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between JUST and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
JUST vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JUST
PFM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
JUST
PFM
Financial Services
JUST
PFM
Consumer Cyclical
JUST
PFM
Communication Services
JUST
PFM
Healthcare
JUST
PFM
Industrials
JUST
PFM
Consumer Defensive
JUST
PFM
Energy
JUST
PFM
Utilities
JUST
PFM
Real Estate
JUST
PFM
Basic Materials
JUST
PFM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JUST vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank
JUST
PFM
JUST vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JUST | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.38 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.78 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | 11.28 | +4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JUST | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.09 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.53 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
JUST vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and PFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JUST | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.83% | -53.21% | +19.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -7.09% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -14.50% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -17.81% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.23% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -6.94% | +1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.75% | +0.13% |
Volatility
JUST vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that JUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JUST | PFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.04% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 7.13% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 9.47% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 13.54% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 15.21% | +3.91% |
JUST vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
JUST vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison
JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUST Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.07% | 1.36% | 1.86% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.58% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 1.70% | 2.56% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JUST and PFM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JUST has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs PFM's -53.21%.
On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 13.24% vs 10.63% for PFM. On fees, JUST is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 10.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JUST is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.
PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.93% for JUST.
JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.53% for PFM.
JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JUST and PFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer