PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUST vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUST vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JUST having a 11.64% return and ILCB slightly lower at 11.12%.


JUST

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
11.64%
6M
11.94%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
22.10%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUST vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
11.64%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%19.59%31.54%-9.62%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between JUST and ILCB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018

0.97

The correlation between JUST and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUST vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUST
ILCB

Technology

35.8%
35.5%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.3%
11.4%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.6%

Industrials

8.6%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.8%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.2%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Technology

JUST
35.8%
ILCB
35.5%

Financial Services

JUST
12.5%
ILCB
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

JUST
9.8%
ILCB
10.1%

Communication Services

JUST
9.3%
ILCB
11.4%

Healthcare

JUST
8.6%
ILCB
8.6%

Industrials

JUST
8.6%
ILCB
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

JUST
5.5%
ILCB
4.8%

Energy

JUST
3.6%
ILCB
3.5%

Utilities

JUST
2.2%
ILCB
2.3%

Real Estate

JUST
2.2%
ILCB
1.8%

Basic Materials

JUST
2.2%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUST vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUST vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUSTILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.10

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

14.24

+1.24

JUST vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUST Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUST and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUSTILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.35

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.79

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.64

+0.14

Drawdowns

JUST vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum ILCB drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSTILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-51.53%

+17.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-9.09%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-19.05%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-25.47%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.67%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-6.24%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.97%

-0.09%

Volatility

JUST vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSTILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.88%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

9.10%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

12.02%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.13%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

18.16%

+0.96%

JUST vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JUST vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JUST and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JUST has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 5-year performance, ILCB leads with 13.45% vs 13.24% for JUST. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCB has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 13.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JUST.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.93% for JUST.

JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.03% for ILCB.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUST and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer