PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JUST vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JUST vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JUST achieves a 12.23% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 9.62% return.


JUST

1D
0.53%
1M
4.51%
YTD
12.23%
6M
12.64%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
22.47%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*

GINN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.65%
YTD
9.62%
6M
8.49%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
20.41%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JUST vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
12.23%17.60%23.73%24.86%-17.88%26.89%5.75%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
9.62%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between JUST and GINN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020

0.88

The correlation between JUST and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JUST vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JUST
GINN

Technology

35.8%
32.4%

Financial Services

12.5%
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
14.6%

Communication Services

9.3%
10.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
18.6%

Industrials

8.6%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
2.0%

Energy

3.6%
1.4%

Utilities

2.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
0.1%

Technology

JUST
35.8%
GINN
32.4%

Financial Services

JUST
12.5%
GINN
11.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JUST
9.8%
GINN
14.6%

Communication Services

JUST
9.3%
GINN
10.8%

Healthcare

JUST
8.6%
GINN
18.6%

Industrials

JUST
8.6%
GINN
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

JUST
5.5%
GINN
2.0%

Energy

JUST
3.6%
GINN
1.4%

Utilities

JUST
2.2%
GINN
1.9%

Real Estate

JUST
2.2%
GINN
0.8%

Basic Materials

JUST
2.2%
GINN
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JUST vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JUST
JUST Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JUST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JUST Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JUST Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JUST Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JUST Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JUST vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JUSTGINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

1.98

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

7.15

+8.60

JUST vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JUST Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JUST and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JUSTGINNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.63

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.33

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.46

+0.32

Drawdowns

JUST vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JUST drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JUST and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JUSTGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-41.25%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-13.18%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-22.25%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-41.25%

+16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.74%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-13.36%

+8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

3.64%

-1.76%

Volatility

JUST vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (JUST) is 2.87%, while Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that JUST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JUSTGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.01%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

12.07%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.88%

16.06%

-4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

21.32%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

21.04%

-1.93%

JUST vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JUST has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JUST vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

JUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than GINN's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%
JUST
Goldman Sachs JUST U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
0.93%1.02%1.11%1.37%1.51%1.07%1.36%1.86%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


JUST and GINN have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GINN has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to JUST (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JUST dropped -33.83% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, JUST leads with 13.36% vs 7.01% for GINN. On fees, JUST is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JUST has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JUST has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JUST is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.93% for JUST.

JUST is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GINN is Technology Equities. JUST tracks JUST US Large Cap Diversified Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for JUST and 0.50% for GINN.

JUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JUST and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer