PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULB vs. TENM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JULB vs. TENM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JULB having a 6.35% return and TENM slightly lower at 6.19%.


JULB

1D
-0.07%
1M
2.40%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TENM

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.19%
6M
6.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JULB vs. TENM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JULB and TENM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JULB vs. TENM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF (TENM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JULB vs. TENM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULBTENMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.17

2.17

0.00

Drawdowns

JULB vs. TENM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULB drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, which is greater than TENM's maximum drawdown of -3.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULB and TENM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JULBTENMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-3.61%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.24%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-0.70%

-0.17%

Volatility

JULB vs. TENM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JULBTENMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.81%

6.52%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.81%

6.52%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.81%

6.52%

+0.29%

JULB vs. TENM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TENM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JULB vs. TENM - Dividend Comparison

JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TENM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.


PositionTTM2025
JULB
Aptus July Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%
TENM
iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Mar ETF
0.28%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JULB and TENM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TENM.

TENM has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JULB and 0.50% for TENM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JULB and TENM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer