PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JTSSX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JTSSX achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, JTSSX has outperformed FFFCX with an annualized return of 10.47%, while FFFCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.49% annualized return.


JTSSX

1D
1.89%
1M
-0.54%
6M
5.93%
YTD
8.69%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
10.47%
ALL TIME*
8.04%

FFFCX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.72%
6M
2.71%
YTD
4.24%
1Y
8.85%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
5.49%
ALL TIME*
6.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
8.69%17.88%12.31%22.36%-18.58%17.53%15.33%24.81%-9.87%21.92%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.24%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.48%

Correlation

The correlation between JTSSX and FFFCX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007

0.92

The correlation between JTSSX and FFFCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (5 years) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JTSSX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JTSSX
JTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
JTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JTSSXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.26

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

9.16

-1.57

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JTSSX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JTSSX drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than FFFCX's maximum drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JTSSX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JTSSXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-36.88%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-4.00%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-4.77%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-18.35%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-18.35%

-14.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-1.23%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-4.55%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.98%

+1.17%

Volatility

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 1.76%. This indicates that JTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JTSSXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

1.76%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

4.92%

+5.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

5.60%

+6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.96%

6.49%

+8.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

6.27%

+9.44%

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JTSSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JTSSX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

JTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than FFFCX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.70%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
4.75%5.16%2.58%1.57%10.75%16.31%4.46%9.76%5.08%3.84%2.97%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JTSSX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JTSSX has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to FFFCX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JTSSX dropped -50.11% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JTSSX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer