PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JTSSX vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JTSSX achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.48% return. Over the past 10 years, JTSSX has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 10.76%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.


JTSSX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.46%
6M
7.32%
YTD
10.00%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
16.61%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.76%

BNDX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-0.06%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
10.00%17.88%12.31%22.36%-18.58%17.53%15.33%24.81%-9.87%21.92%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.48%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JTSSX and BNDX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.04

Over the past year, JTSSX and BNDX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JTSSX vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JTSSX
JTSSX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
JTSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JTSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JTSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JTSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JTSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JTSSXBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.10

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

0.66

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.39

1.80

+6.60

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JTSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JTSSX and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JTSSX drawdown since its inception was -50.11%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JTSSX and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JTSSXBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.11%

-16.23%

-33.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-2.93%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-2.93%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-15.86%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.24%

-16.23%

-17.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.55%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.10%

-3.09%

-4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.08%

+1.05%

Volatility

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund (JTSSX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.14%. This indicates that JTSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JTSSXBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

1.14%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

3.07%

+7.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

3.53%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

4.90%

+10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

4.09%

+11.59%

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JTSSX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JTSSX vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

JTSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than BNDX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.52%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
JTSSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement 2050 Fund
4.69%5.16%2.58%1.57%10.75%16.31%4.46%9.76%5.08%3.84%2.97%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


JTSSX and BNDX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JTSSX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to BNDX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JTSSX dropped -50.11% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

JTSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JTSSX and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer