PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSML vs. VTWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSML vs. VTWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 21.35% return, which is significantly higher than VTWG's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed VTWG with an annualized return of 12.63%, while VTWG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.


JSML

1D
-1.29%
1M
-0.10%
6M
14.90%
YTD
21.35%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
12.63%

VTWG

1D
-1.52%
1M
-1.10%
6M
8.49%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSML vs. VTWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
21.35%13.41%12.45%30.09%-29.40%3.08%35.38%32.50%-2.53%20.93%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
16.93%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JSML and VTWG is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.88

The correlation between JSML and VTWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSML vs. VTWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSML
VTWG

Healthcare

25.2%
22.0%

Technology

21.1%
25.8%

Industrials

13.8%
23.1%

Financial Services

8.8%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.1%

Basic Materials

3.3%
4.0%

Energy

2.6%
3.1%

Real Estate

2.6%
2.0%

Communication Services

1.7%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.3%

Utilities

-

0.6%

Healthcare

JSML
25.2%
VTWG
22.0%

Technology

JSML
21.1%
VTWG
25.8%

Industrials

JSML
13.8%
VTWG
23.1%

Financial Services

JSML
8.8%
VTWG
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JSML
8.0%
VTWG
7.1%

Basic Materials

JSML
3.3%
VTWG
4.0%

Energy

JSML
2.6%
VTWG
3.1%

Real Estate

JSML
2.6%
VTWG
2.0%

Communication Services

JSML
1.7%
VTWG
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

JSML
1.0%
VTWG
2.3%

Utilities

JSML

-

VTWG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSML vs. VTWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSML vs. VTWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMLVTWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.06

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

7.32

+0.39

JSML vs. VTWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VTWG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSML and VTWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSML vs. VTWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum VTWG drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and VTWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMLVTWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-42.07%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.84%

-14.88%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-28.58%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

-40.49%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.65%

-42.07%

+2.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.59%

-4.36%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-10.46%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

4.17%

+0.05%

Volatility

JSML vs. VTWG - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) at 5.30%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMLVTWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

5.30%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.32%

16.93%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

22.29%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.52%

24.65%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.26%

24.23%

+0.03%

JSML vs. VTWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSML vs. VTWG - Dividend Comparison

JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, which matches VTWG's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.61%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%0.00%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.61%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, JSML and VTWG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSML has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to VTWG (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs VTWG's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 12.63% vs 10.99% for VTWG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWG has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 12.63% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.

JSML and VTWG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.61%.

JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.06% for VTWG.

JSML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSML and VTWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer