JSML vs. SMMD
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JSML tracks the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index while SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSML returned 6.42%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for SMMD. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SMMD.
Performance
JSML vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than SMMD's 18.99% return.
JSML
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 20.92%
- 6M
- 19.03%
- 1Y
- 35.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
SMMD
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 18.99%
- 6M
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 36.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
JSML vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 20.92% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 32.50% | -2.53% | 11.09% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 18.99% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and SMMD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between JSML and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
SMMD
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
SMMD
Industrials
JSML
SMMD
Healthcare
JSML
SMMD
Financial Services
JSML
SMMD
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
SMMD
Real Estate
JSML
SMMD
Basic Materials
JSML
SMMD
Consumer Defensive
JSML
SMMD
Energy
JSML
SMMD
Communication Services
JSML
SMMD
Utilities
JSML
-
SMMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
SMMD
JSML vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 3.84 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | 14.65 | -6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.16 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.37 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.50 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
JSML vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and SMMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -41.06% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -9.66% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -25.50% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -28.26% | -9.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -8.37% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.53% | +1.64% |
Volatility
JSML vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) at 5.01%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 5.01% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 12.58% | +3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.59% | 17.16% | +4.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.35% | 20.82% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 22.36% | +1.91% |
JSML vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than SMMD's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.79% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, JSML and SMMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JSML has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to SMMD (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs SMMD's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.75% vs 6.42% for JSML. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SMMD has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 6.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.
SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.79% for JSML.
JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.15% for SMMD.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and SMMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer