PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JSML vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JSML vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JSML achieves a 24.06% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 22.67% return. Over the past 10 years, JSML has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 13.62%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.73% annualized return.


JSML

1D
0.24%
1M
7.62%
YTD
24.06%
6M
20.85%
1Y
36.90%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
13.62%

SCHA

1D
0.11%
1M
4.68%
YTD
22.67%
6M
19.77%
1Y
40.05%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JSML vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
24.06%13.41%12.45%30.09%-29.40%3.08%35.38%32.50%-2.53%20.93%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
22.67%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JSML and SCHA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.87

The correlation between JSML and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

JSML vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JSML
SCHA

Technology

24.9%
24.3%

Industrials

22.7%
15.4%

Healthcare

21.6%
13.8%

Financial Services

10.2%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
9.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.1%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
5.8%

Energy

1.8%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
2.5%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

JSML
24.9%
SCHA
24.3%

Industrials

JSML
22.7%
SCHA
15.4%

Healthcare

JSML
21.6%
SCHA
13.8%

Financial Services

JSML
10.2%
SCHA
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JSML
8.5%
SCHA
9.2%

Basic Materials

JSML
2.4%
SCHA
4.1%

Communication Services

JSML
2.0%
SCHA
2.3%

Real Estate

JSML
2.0%
SCHA
5.8%

Energy

JSML
1.8%
SCHA
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

JSML
1.5%
SCHA
2.5%

Utilities

JSML

-

SCHA
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JSML vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JSML
JSML Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JSML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSML Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSML Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JSML Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSML Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JSML vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JSMLSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.23

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

15.49

-6.65

JSML vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JSML Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JSML and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JSML vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JSMLSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.65%

-42.41%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.84%

-9.50%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.60%

-27.29%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.91%

-30.79%

-7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.65%

-42.41%

+2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.61%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-7.56%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.59%

+1.59%

Volatility

JSML vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 6.71%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JSMLSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

6.71%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

13.91%

+2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

18.75%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.50%

22.04%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.31%

22.75%

+1.56%

JSML vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

JSML vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SCHA's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSML
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.77%0.94%1.19%0.49%0.67%0.46%0.30%0.27%0.76%0.42%0.52%0.00%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.98%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JSML and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JSML has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to SCHA (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, JSML leads with 13.62% vs 11.73% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSML has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSML.

SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.77% for JSML.

JSML is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JSML and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer