JSML vs. FYC
JSML (Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and FYC (First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JSML tracks the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index while FYC tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JSML returned 12.88%/yr vs 14.30%/yr for FYC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JSML charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for FYC.
Performance
JSML vs. FYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JSML having a 19.06% return and FYC slightly higher at 20.01%. Over the past 10 years, JSML has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 12.88%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.
JSML
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 17.83%
- 1Y
- 33.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
FYC
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 20.01%
- 6M
- 20.96%
- 1Y
- 53.40%
- 3Y*
- 26.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
JSML vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.06% | 13.41% | 12.45% | 30.09% | -29.40% | 3.08% | 35.38% | 32.50% | -2.53% | 20.93% |
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 20.01% | 24.24% | 23.99% | 14.52% | -25.86% | 21.64% | 32.34% | 16.79% | -5.54% | 22.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSML and FYC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between JSML and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSML vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSML
FYC
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
JSML
FYC
Industrials
JSML
FYC
Healthcare
JSML
FYC
Financial Services
JSML
FYC
Consumer Cyclical
JSML
FYC
Real Estate
JSML
FYC
Basic Materials
JSML
FYC
Consumer Defensive
JSML
FYC
Energy
JSML
FYC
Communication Services
JSML
FYC
Utilities
JSML
-
FYC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSML vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank
JSML
FYC
JSML vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JSML | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 5.12 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 18.64 | -10.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JSML | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 2.55 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.45 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.54 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
JSML vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSML drawdown since its inception was -39.65%, smaller than the maximum FYC drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSML and FYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSML | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.65% | -47.85% | +8.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -10.48% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.60% | -27.79% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.91% | -35.37% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.65% | -47.85% | +8.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.83% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -9.66% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.87% | +1.30% |
Volatility
JSML vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) has a higher volatility of 7.49% compared to First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) at 5.53%. This indicates that JSML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSML | FYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.49% | 5.53% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.94% | 14.99% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.56% | 21.03% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 23.62% | +0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 24.57% | -0.30% |
JSML vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSML has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSML vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison
JSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYC First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.72% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.12% | 0.39% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.31% | 0.21% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.80% | 0.94% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, JSML and FYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JSML has higher volatility (7.49%) compared to FYC (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSML dropped -39.65% vs FYC's -47.85%.
On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.30% vs 12.88% for JSML. On fees, JSML is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FYC has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.30% return vs 12.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSML is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.
JSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.
JSML tracks Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSML and 0.71% for FYC.
FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSML and FYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer