JSMD vs. PAMC
JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - JSMD tracks the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index while PAMC tracks the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JSMD returned 7.42%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for PAMC. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JSMD charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.
Performance
JSMD vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JSMD having a 16.38% return and PAMC slightly higher at 16.89%.
JSMD
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.97%
PAMC
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 27.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.51M | $7.19M | $7.86M | |
| $181.46K | $141.60K | $352.24K |
JSMD vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 16.38% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 36.17% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 16.89% | 1.54% | 26.20% | 19.30% | -12.15% | 13.15% | 34.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between JSMD and PAMC is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between JSMD and PAMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
JSMD vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JSMD
PAMC
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
JSMD
PAMC
Industrials
JSMD
PAMC
Healthcare
JSMD
PAMC
Financial Services
JSMD
PAMC
Consumer Cyclical
JSMD
PAMC
Real Estate
JSMD
PAMC
Communication Services
JSMD
PAMC
Basic Materials
JSMD
PAMC
Consumer Defensive
JSMD
PAMC
Energy
JSMD
PAMC
Utilities
JSMD
-
PAMC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JSMD vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank
JSMD
PAMC
JSMD vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JSMD | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.27 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.68 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 9.70 | -4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JSMD vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JSMD drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than PAMC's maximum drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JSMD and PAMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JSMD | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -27.04% | -11.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.86% | -10.24% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -26.07% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.18% | -26.61% | -5.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -2.25% | -4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -7.32% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 2.83% | +1.86% |
Volatility
JSMD vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) at 4.35%. This indicates that JSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JSMD | PAMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 4.35% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.87% | 14.15% | +3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.59% | 18.88% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.15% | 20.22% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 20.62% | +2.25% |
JSMD vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JSMD has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JSMD vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison
JSMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than PAMC's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.11% | 1.11% | 0.97% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JSMD and PAMC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to PAMC (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JSMD dropped -38.98% vs PAMC's -27.04%.
On 5-year performance, PAMC leads with 9.85% vs 7.42% for JSMD. On fees, JSMD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, PAMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 9.85% return vs 7.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JSMD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.
PAMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.
JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index, while PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JSMD and 0.60% for PAMC.
PAMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JSMD and PAMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer