JQUA vs. USL
JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - JQUA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JQUA returned 13.92%/yr vs 17.05%/yr for USL. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
JQUA vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
JQUA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
JQUA vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.16% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -2.98% | 5.07% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | 27.10% | 62.48% | -25.23% | 28.01% | -14.15% | 4.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between JQUA and USL is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between JQUA and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JQUA vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JQUA
USL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
JQUA
USL
-
Financial Services
JQUA
USL
Consumer Cyclical
JQUA
USL
-
Industrials
JQUA
USL
-
Healthcare
JQUA
USL
-
Communication Services
JQUA
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
JQUA
USL
-
Energy
JQUA
USL
-
Utilities
JQUA
USL
-
Real Estate
JQUA
USL
-
Basic Materials
JQUA
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JQUA vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
JQUA
USL
JQUA vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JQUA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.39 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.48 | 6.85 | +6.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JQUA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.99 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.57 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.01 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
JQUA vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JQUA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.92% | -89.06% | +56.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -16.76% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.81% | -23.33% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -33.82% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -39.10% | +38.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -61.45% | +57.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 8.27% | -6.58% |
Volatility
JQUA vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) is 2.82%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that JQUA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JQUA | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 10.57% | -7.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.31% | 23.34% | -15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 28.59% | -17.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 30.09% | -14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 32.34% | -14.35% |
JQUA vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
JQUA vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JQUA and USL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to JQUA (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs 13.92% for JQUA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs 13.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
JQUA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.88% for USL.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JQUA and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer