JQUA vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. JQUA is passively managed, while FITZ is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.

Performance

JQUA vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JQUA

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQUA vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	-0.99%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and FITZ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.66

Return for Risk

JQUA vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA

JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 54
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQUA vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JQUA	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JQUA	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	-5.11	+5.92

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -4.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JQUA	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.92%	-4.81%	-28.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.09%	-4.81%	+1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-1.70%	-2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JQUA	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.57%	18.34%	-6.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.66%	18.34%	-2.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	18.34%	-0.33%

JQUA vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JQUA vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.10%	1.19%	1.24%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%	1.44%	1.67%	2.10%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JQUA and FITZ in my portfolio?

JQUA and FITZ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JQUA or FITZ?

On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JQUA or FITZ?

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JQUA or FITZ?

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between JQUA and FITZ?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.75% for FITZ.