PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPUS vs. JMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPUS vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPUS achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.


JPUS

1D
0.04%
1M
1.45%
YTD
11.55%
6M
11.59%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
11.49%

JMOM

1D
-0.17%
1M
9.35%
YTD
22.79%
6M
22.27%
1Y
36.77%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
16.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPUS vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
11.55%11.18%13.48%10.98%-8.47%29.09%7.54%25.50%-6.14%3.96%
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
22.79%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JPUS and JMOM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.78

The correlation between JPUS and JMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JPUS vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JPUS
JMOM

Technology

11.6%
38.1%

Healthcare

11.5%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
5.7%

Real Estate

10.5%
2.5%

Industrials

10.4%
12.8%

Utilities

9.5%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
6.9%

Financial Services

8.0%
9.6%

Energy

7.3%
3.8%

Basic Materials

6.8%
1.3%

Communication Services

4.5%
8.3%

Technology

JPUS
11.6%
JMOM
38.1%

Healthcare

JPUS
11.5%
JMOM
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

JPUS
11.3%
JMOM
5.7%

Real Estate

JPUS
10.5%
JMOM
2.5%

Industrials

JPUS
10.4%
JMOM
12.8%

Utilities

JPUS
9.5%
JMOM
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JPUS
8.6%
JMOM
6.9%

Financial Services

JPUS
8.0%
JMOM
9.6%

Energy

JPUS
7.3%
JMOM
3.8%

Basic Materials

JPUS
6.8%
JMOM
1.3%

Communication Services

JPUS
4.5%
JMOM
8.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPUS vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JPUS
JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JPUS vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JPUSJMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

4.69

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

22.24

-10.13

JPUS vs. JMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the JMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPUS and JMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JPUSJMOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.58

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.88

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.82

-0.10

Drawdowns

JPUS vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPUS drawdown since its inception was -38.69%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPUS and JMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPUSJMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-34.31%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.87%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.96%

-19.51%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-28.26%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.17%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-6.32%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.66%

+0.06%

Volatility

JPUS vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) is 2.90%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that JPUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPUSJMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

4.62%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.58%

11.55%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.41%

14.32%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

18.65%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.76%

20.13%

-3.37%

JPUS vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPUS vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison

JPUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.71%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%
JPUS
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF
2.04%2.27%2.12%2.26%2.35%1.67%1.94%2.09%2.16%1.25%0.77%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPUS and JMOM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to JPUS (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPUS dropped -38.69% vs JMOM's -34.31%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 9.40% for JPUS. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPUS.

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.

JPUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JMOM is Momentum. JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JPUS and 0.12% for JMOM.

JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPUS and JMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer