PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPFP vs. TFFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPFP vs. TFFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JPFP

1D
-1.01%
1M
-1.32%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TFFI

1D
0.21%
1M
1.17%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JPFP vs. TFFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JPFP and TFFI is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPFP vs. TFFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP) and Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JPFP vs. TFFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPFP vs. TFFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPFP drawdown since its inception was -6.04%, which is greater than TFFI's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPFP and TFFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPFPTFFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-4.23%

-1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-1.83%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-1.66%

-1.49%

Volatility

JPFP vs. TFFI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPFPTFFIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.27%

7.92%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

7.92%

+11.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

7.92%

+11.35%

JPFP vs. TFFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPFP has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TFFI's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

JPFP vs. TFFI - Dividend Comparison

Neither JPFP nor TFFI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JPFP and TFFI have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.

JPFP and TFFI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JPFP is categorized as Systematic Trend, while TFFI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Chesapeake. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JPFP and 1.01% for TFFI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPFP and TFFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer