PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFFI vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFFI vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TFFI

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.27%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
1.23%
1M
-4.96%
6M
39.30%
YTD
42.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFFI vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TFFI and POW is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFFI vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Trend-Following Fixed Income ETF (TFFI) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TFFI vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFFI vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFFI drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFFI and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFFIPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-17.41%

+13.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-16.37%

+14.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-4.18%

+2.53%

Volatility

TFFI vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFFIPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.06%

32.79%

-24.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

32.79%

-24.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

32.79%

-24.73%

TFFI vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFFI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFFI vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

TFFI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TFFI and POW have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, POW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

POW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TFFI.

POW has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for TFFI.

They also come from different issuers: Chesapeake and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TFFI and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFFI and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer