PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOET vs. VOTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JOET vs. VOTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JOET vs. VOTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
-3.93%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%16.09%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
-3.84%17.95%25.23%27.60%-19.74%12.08%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JOET having a -3.93% return and VOTE slightly higher at -3.84%.


JOET

1D
0.80%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-5.31%
1Y
10.37%
3Y*
14.63%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*

VOTE

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-3.84%
6M
-1.77%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JOET vs. VOTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VOTE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JOET vs. VOTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. VOTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOETVOTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

1.00

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

1.52

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.57

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.60

7.30

-3.70

JOET vs. VOTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the VOTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and VOTE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOETVOTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.00

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.63

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and VOTE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JOET vs. VOTE - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than VOTE's 1.04% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.68%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
1.04%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%0.00%

Drawdowns

JOET vs. VOTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, roughly equal to the maximum VOTE drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and VOTE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JOETVOTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-25.71%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-12.07%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-5.68%

-1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-6.34%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.59%

+0.48%

Volatility

JOET vs. VOTE - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) have volatilities of 5.53% and 5.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JOETVOTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

5.40%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

9.74%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.87%

18.50%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.30%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.30%

+0.32%