PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOET vs. PEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOET vs. PEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than PEZ's -4.23% return.


JOET

1D
0.00%
1M
5.74%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.85%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*

PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOET vs. PEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
7.43%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%26.79%6.00%
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and PEZ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.78

The correlation between JOET and PEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

JOET vs. PEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JOET
PEZ

Technology

23.1%
4.0%

Industrials

22.6%
3.8%

Financial Services

15.1%
0.6%

Healthcare

11.1%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
66.0%

Energy

5.8%

-

Communication Services

4.0%
11.9%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Real Estate

2.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
8.7%

Utilities

0.8%

-

Technology

JOET
23.1%
PEZ
4.0%

Industrials

JOET
22.6%
PEZ
3.8%

Financial Services

JOET
15.1%
PEZ
0.6%

Healthcare

JOET
11.1%
PEZ
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JOET
10.3%
PEZ
66.0%

Energy

JOET
5.8%
PEZ

-

Communication Services

JOET
4.0%
PEZ
11.9%

Basic Materials

JOET
3.2%
PEZ

-

Real Estate

JOET
2.4%
PEZ
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

JOET
1.6%
PEZ
8.7%

Utilities

JOET
0.8%
PEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOET vs. PEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. PEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOETPEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.06

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

0.34

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

0.91

+4.27

JOET vs. PEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the PEZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and PEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOETPEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.27

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.11

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.32

+0.39

Drawdowns

JOET vs. PEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum PEZ drawdown of -58.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and PEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOETPEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-58.39%

+31.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-15.83%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-31.48%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-41.72%

+15.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.25%

+11.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-13.86%

+6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

5.96%

-3.25%

Volatility

JOET vs. PEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.50%, while Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOETPEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

4.91%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

15.13%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

20.07%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

24.48%

-6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

25.06%

-7.54%

JOET vs. PEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PEZ's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOET vs. PEZ - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than PEZ's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.61%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOET and PEZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEZ has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to JOET (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs PEZ's -58.39%.

On 5-year performance, JOET leads with 10.88% vs 2.63% for PEZ. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JOET has performed better with a 10.88% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.60% for PEZ.

JOET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOET and PEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer