JOET vs. MTUM
JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - JOET tracks the Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JOET returned 10.88%/yr vs 15.21%/yr for MTUM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
JOET vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
JOET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
JOET vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 7.43% | 11.89% | 24.01% | 16.34% | -18.04% | 26.79% | 6.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 7.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOET and MTUM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between JOET and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
JOET vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JOET
MTUM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
JOET
MTUM
Industrials
JOET
MTUM
Financial Services
JOET
MTUM
Healthcare
JOET
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
JOET
MTUM
Energy
JOET
MTUM
Communication Services
JOET
MTUM
Basic Materials
JOET
MTUM
Real Estate
JOET
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
JOET
MTUM
Utilities
JOET
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOET vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
JOET
MTUM
JOET vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JOET | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.64 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 14.50 | -9.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JOET | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 2.20 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.85 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
JOET vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOET | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -34.08% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -11.54% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -20.99% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -32.28% | +5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -6.21% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.89% | -0.18% |
Volatility
JOET vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) is 3.50%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that JOET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOET | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 7.68% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 16.46% | -6.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 19.04% | -5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 20.60% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 21.03% | -3.51% |
JOET vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOET vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOET and MTUM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to JOET (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.21% vs 10.88% for JOET. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JOET has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.21% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JOET.
JOET has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOET and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer