JNJ vs. KMB
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 10.61%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for KMB. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JNJ vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 17.75% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 10.61%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.48% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 62.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
KMB
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- -13.85%
- 3Y*
- -4.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
JNJ vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.75% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 8.57% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and KMB is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
JNJ:
$589.29B
KMB:
$35.56B
JNJ:
$8.65
KMB:
$5.93
JNJ:
27.87
KMB:
18.01
JNJ:
0.93
KMB:
3.11
JNJ:
6.08
KMB:
2.15
JNJ:
7.26
KMB:
19.80
JNJ:
$96.36B
KMB:
$16.54B
JNJ:
$66.60B
KMB:
$5.93B
JNJ:
$31.62B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
KMB
JNJ vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNJ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 0.92 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | -0.47 | +6.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.62 | -0.70 | +17.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -36.97% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -29.60% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -34.06% | +18.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -34.06% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -34.06% | +6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -23.33% | +20.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -8.86% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 19.71% | -15.95% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 7.01%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 9.98%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 9.98% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 17.53% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 26.23% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 20.35% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 21.14% | -2.60% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than KMB's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.17% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.76% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
JNJ vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JNJ vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and KMB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to JNJ (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs KMB's -36.97%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer