JNJ vs. KMB
JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, JNJ returned 10.43%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for KMB. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
JNJ vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNJ achieves a 24.55% return, which is significantly higher than KMB's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, JNJ has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 10.43%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 24.55%
- 1Y
- 52.77%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.26%
KMB
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- -12.10%
- 3Y*
- -0.48%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.08B | $2.07B | $2.01B | |
| $449.61M | $431.76M | $467.83M |
JNJ vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 24.55% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 13.49% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JNJ and KMB is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
JNJ:
$614.36B
KMB:
$37.03B
JNJ:
$8.63
KMB:
$5.87
JNJ:
29.55
KMB:
19.02
JNJ:
0.98
KMB:
3.29
JNJ:
6.35
KMB:
2.24
JNJ:
7.32
KMB:
21.25
JNJ:
$97.93B
KMB:
$16.57B
JNJ:
$68.99B
KMB:
$6.08B
JNJ:
$31.92B
KMB:
$3.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JNJ vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
JNJ
KMB
JNJ vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JNJ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.94 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | -0.41 | +5.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | -0.60 | +13.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JNJ vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNJ drawdown since its inception was -50.67%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNJ and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNJ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.67% | -36.97% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.96% | -29.60% | +18.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.72% | -34.06% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.41% | -34.06% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.37% | -34.06% | +6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -19.86% | +15.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.88% | -8.89% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 20.36% | -16.41% |
Volatility
JNJ vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) is 7.58%, while Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that JNJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JNJ | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 8.86% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.99% | 19.00% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 27.03% | -8.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 20.70% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 21.29% | -2.53% |
Dividends
JNJ vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than KMB's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.06% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.55% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
JNJ vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Johnson & Johnson and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JNJ vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 18.50B and revenue of 25.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.1%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.3%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 7.17B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.3%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 448.00M and revenue of 4.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.53B and revenue of 25.31B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 345.00M and revenue of 4.19B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JNJ and KMB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.86%) compared to JNJ (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNJ dropped -50.67% vs KMB's -36.97%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JNJ and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer