JMSI vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JMSI (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMSI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. JMSI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

JMSI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 17.58% return.

JMSI

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund	1.06%	0.16%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and MLPI is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

JMSI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI

JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 58
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 73
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMSI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMSI	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	3.49	-2.46

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum MLPI drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMSI	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-5.38%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-3.84%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-1.27%	+0.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JMSI	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91%	13.05%	-10.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.73%	13.05%	-9.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.73%	13.05%	-9.32%

JMSI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMSI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than MLPI's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund	3.65%	3.65%	3.66%	1.79%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMSI and MLPI in my portfolio?

JMSI and MLPI have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JMSI or MLPI?

On fees, JMSI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMSI or MLPI?

JMSI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMSI or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 3.65% for JMSI.

What is the main difference between JMSI and MLPI?

JMSI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MLPI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.68% for MLPI.