MLPI vs. VOLT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and VOLT (Tema Electrification ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Neos, while VOLT is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for VOLT.

Performance

MLPI vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 28.30% return.

MLPI

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.05%
• 6M: 11.52%
• YTD: 18.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

VOLT

• 1D: 1.62%
• 1M: -5.26%
• 6M: 15.18%
• YTD: 28.30%
• 1Y: 38.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	$23.44M	$21.53M	$19.40M
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	$11.21M	$11.77M	$15.67M

MLPI vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	18.15%	0.36%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	28.30%	2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and VOLT is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

MLPI vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VOLT

VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 63
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPI vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPI	VOLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.50	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.26	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.15	—

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum VOLT drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and VOLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPI	VOLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-23.40%	+18.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.36%	-11.75%	+8.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-5.34%	+3.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.50%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPI	VOLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.11%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.31%	24.43%	-11.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.31%	25.46%	-12.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.31%	25.46%	-12.15%

MLPI vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPI vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, more than VOLT's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	8.63%	0.00%	0.00%
VOLT Tema Electrification ETF	0.36%	0.46%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPI and VOLT in my portfolio?

MLPI and VOLT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPI or VOLT?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPI or VOLT?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for VOLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPI or VOLT?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.63%, compared with 0.36% for VOLT.

What is the main difference between MLPI and VOLT?

MLPI is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while VOLT is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.75% for VOLT.