PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSI vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSI vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JMSI having a 1.06% return and JPLD slightly lower at 1.04%.


JMSI

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.41%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and JPLD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023

0.44

JMSI vs. JPLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMSI
JPLD

Technology

36.9%
7.4%

Financial Services

11.7%
13.7%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
1.6%

Industrials

7.2%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
0.1%

Energy

3.9%
0.1%

Utilities

2.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
7.8%

Technology

JMSI
36.9%
JPLD
7.4%

Financial Services

JMSI
11.7%
JPLD
13.7%

Communication Services

JMSI
10.4%
JPLD
10.1%

Healthcare

JMSI
9.8%
JPLD
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JMSI
9.5%
JPLD
1.6%

Industrials

JMSI
7.2%
JPLD
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

JMSI
4.7%
JPLD
0.1%

Energy

JMSI
3.9%
JPLD
0.1%

Utilities

JMSI
2.4%
JPLD
0.4%

Basic Materials

JMSI
1.8%
JPLD
1.4%

Real Estate

JMSI
1.8%
JPLD
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSI vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI
JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.68

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

4.71

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

21.78

-14.72

JMSI vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

3.22

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

3.25

-2.22

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-1.17%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-1.00%

-1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.12%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-0.15%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.22%

+0.64%

Volatility

JMSI vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that JMSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.37%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

0.97%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

1.47%

+1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

1.83%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

1.83%

+1.90%

JMSI vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMSI vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than JPLD's 4.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JMSI and JPLD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMSI has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, JMSI leads with 6.08% vs 4.71% for JPLD. On fees, JMSI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JMSI has performed better with a 6.08% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMSI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.65% for JMSI.

JMSI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSI and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer