PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JPLD vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JPLD vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JPLD achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.54% return.


JPLD

1D
0.04%
1M
0.15%
6M
0.97%
YTD
1.57%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.75%

BND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$451.00M$507.49M$592.68M
$14.99M$21.36M$24.34M

JPLD vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JPLD
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
1.57%6.01%6.49%3.15%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.54%7.08%1.38%3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between JPLD and BND is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2023

0.72

The correlation between JPLD and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JPLD vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JPLD vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JPLDBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.12

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.12

0.99

+3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.72

2.48

+16.25

JPLD vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JPLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JPLD and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JPLD vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JPLD drawdown since its inception was -1.17%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPLD and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JPLDBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-18.58%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.00%

-2.68%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.17%

-4.81%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.15%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.15%

-3.06%

+2.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

1.07%

-0.85%

Volatility

JPLD vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) is 0.36%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that JPLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JPLDBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.98%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

2.90%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49%

3.70%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.82%

6.03%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

5.53%

-3.71%

JPLD vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

JPLD has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JPLD vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

JPLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.69%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
JPLD
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
3.91%4.24%4.47%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JPLD and BND have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to JPLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPLD dropped -1.17% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 3-year performance, JPLD leads with 5.75% vs 3.92% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JPLD has performed better with a 5.75% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.69% for BND.

JPLD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPLD and 0.03% for BND.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JPLD and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer