JMOM vs. GTLLX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX).
JMOM is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. GTLLX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Feb 27, 2004.
Performance
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 1.15% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | -3.91% | 17.44% | 20.71% | 27.10% | -21.69% | 32.91% | 18.80% | 34.86% | -5.23% | 4.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than GTLLX's -3.91% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 21.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- —
GTLLX
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- -3.91%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 20.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GTLLX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. GTLLX — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
GTLLX
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.95 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.48 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.29 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.75 | 5.23 | +4.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.95 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.36 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.50 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and GTLLX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than GTLLX's 15.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.87% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 15.95% | 15.33% | 40.42% | 4.91% | 7.93% | 20.20% | 15.12% | 14.10% | 16.97% | 2.29% | 0.58% | 0.61% |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and GTLLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -54.32% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -12.16% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -41.54% | +13.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -20.87% | +17.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -8.56% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 3.20% | -0.82% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) have volatilities of 6.53% and 6.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | GTLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 6.78% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.39% | 13.31% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.79% | 22.44% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 28.90% | -10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 24.92% | -4.72% |