PortfoliosLab logo
GTLLX vs. GTLOX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GTLLX and GTLOX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

GTLLX vs. GTLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GTLLX:

0.43

GTLOX:

-0.54

Sortino Ratio

GTLLX:

0.79

GTLOX:

-0.52

Omega Ratio

GTLLX:

1.11

GTLOX:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

GTLLX:

0.47

GTLOX:

-0.32

Martin Ratio

GTLLX:

1.62

GTLOX:

-0.94

Ulcer Index

GTLLX:

6.55%

GTLOX:

15.90%

Daily Std Dev

GTLLX:

23.48%

GTLOX:

27.23%

Max Drawdown

GTLLX:

-54.32%

GTLOX:

-54.09%

Current Drawdown

GTLLX:

-6.11%

GTLOX:

-38.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLLX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than GTLOX's -1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLLX has outperformed GTLOX with an annualized return of 12.69%, while GTLOX has yielded a comparatively lower -0.33% annualized return.


GTLLX

YTD

1.15%

1M

17.46%

6M

2.77%

1Y

10.12%

3Y*

15.50%

5Y*

15.10%

10Y*

12.69%

GTLOX

YTD

-1.79%

1M

11.39%

6M

-21.47%

1Y

-14.60%

3Y*

-7.25%

5Y*

-2.01%

10Y*

-0.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GTLLX vs. GTLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTLLX and GTLOX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GTLLX vs. GTLOX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTLLX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTLLX is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GTLOX is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GTLOX is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GTLLX vs. GTLOX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GTLLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the GTLOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLLX and GTLOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GTLLX vs. GTLOX - Dividend Comparison

GTLLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GTLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.15%0.39%0.15%0.38%0.49%0.62%0.46%0.58%0.61%0.53%
GTLOX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio
1.02%1.13%1.00%1.42%0.77%1.08%1.11%1.35%0.86%1.08%1.01%0.90%

Drawdowns

GTLLX vs. GTLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLLX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, roughly equal to the maximum GTLOX drawdown of -54.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLLX and GTLOX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GTLLX vs. GTLOX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio (GTLOX) at 5.08%. This indicates that GTLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTLOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...