JMOM vs. DVOL
JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and DVOL (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF) are both Momentum funds - JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index while DVOL tracks the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JMOM returned 16.28%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for DVOL. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMOM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DVOL.
Performance
JMOM vs. DVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 22.79% return, which is significantly higher than DVOL's 1.61% return.
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
DVOL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM vs. DVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -15.08% |
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 1.61% | 4.30% | 24.84% | 5.39% | -16.10% | 30.08% | 11.15% | 26.10% | -9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMOM and DVOL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between JMOM and DVOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JMOM vs. DVOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMOM
DVOL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
JMOM
DVOL
Industrials
JMOM
DVOL
Financial Services
JMOM
DVOL
Healthcare
JMOM
DVOL
Communication Services
JMOM
DVOL
Consumer Cyclical
JMOM
DVOL
Consumer Defensive
JMOM
DVOL
Energy
JMOM
DVOL
Real Estate
JMOM
DVOL
Utilities
JMOM
DVOL
Basic Materials
JMOM
DVOL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMOM vs. DVOL — Risk / Return Rank
JMOM
DVOL
JMOM vs. DVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.02 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 0.08 | +4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.24 | 0.30 | +21.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 0.07 | +2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.48 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.50 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
JMOM vs. DVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum DVOL drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and DVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.31% | -38.26% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.87% | -9.82% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.51% | -11.66% | -7.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -24.65% | -3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -4.85% | +4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -7.17% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.87% | -1.21% |
Volatility
JMOM vs. DVOL - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) at 2.91%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMOM | DVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 2.91% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 9.35% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.32% | 11.79% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 14.40% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 17.72% | +2.41% |
JMOM vs. DVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DVOL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMOM vs. DVOL - Dividend Comparison
JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than DVOL's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVOL First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF | 0.68% | 0.86% | 0.67% | 1.28% | 1.37% | 0.47% | 0.60% | 1.79% | 0.39% | 0.00% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMOM and DVOL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to DVOL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs DVOL's -38.26%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 6.82% for DVOL. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.68% for DVOL.
JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.60% for DVOL.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMOM and DVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer