PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVOL vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVOL vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVOL achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.37% return.


DVOL

1D
0.45%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
1.20%
6M
2.04%
1Y
0.20%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*

MTUM

1D
2.87%
1M
14.36%
YTD
30.37%
6M
31.51%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
34.28%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
17.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVOL vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
1.20%4.30%24.84%5.39%-16.10%30.08%11.15%26.10%-9.89%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
30.37%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-13.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DVOL and MTUM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018

0.69

The correlation between DVOL and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DVOL vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DVOL
MTUM

Financial Services

18.8%
10.4%

Industrials

16.6%
15.6%

Energy

14.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

12.1%
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
3.3%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.7%

Technology

4.7%
44.4%

Healthcare

3.7%
6.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
7.4%

Utilities

3.0%
1.6%

Financial Services

DVOL
18.8%
MTUM
10.4%

Industrials

DVOL
16.6%
MTUM
15.6%

Energy

DVOL
14.0%
MTUM
3.5%

Real Estate

DVOL
12.1%
MTUM
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DVOL
9.4%
MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

DVOL
8.2%
MTUM
3.3%

Basic Materials

DVOL
6.0%
MTUM
1.7%

Technology

DVOL
4.7%
MTUM
44.4%

Healthcare

DVOL
3.7%
MTUM
6.9%

Communication Services

DVOL
3.6%
MTUM
7.4%

Utilities

DVOL
3.0%
MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVOL vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVOL
DVOL Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVOL vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DVOLMTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

2.15

-2.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.11

2.92

-2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.39

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

3.63

-3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

14.50

-14.37

DVOL vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVOL and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DVOLMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

2.15

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.74

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.84

-0.35

Drawdowns

DVOL vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVOL drawdown since its inception was -38.26%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVOL and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVOLMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.26%

-34.08%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-11.54%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-20.99%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

-32.28%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

0.00%

-5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-6.21%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.89%

+0.02%

Volatility

DVOL vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) is 2.87%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that DVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVOLMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

7.73%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

16.49%

-7.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

19.03%

-7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

20.59%

-6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

21.04%

-3.31%

DVOL vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVOL vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

DVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVOL
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF
0.69%0.86%0.67%1.28%1.37%0.47%0.60%1.79%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVOL and MTUM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to DVOL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVOL dropped -38.26% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 5-year performance, MTUM leads with 15.20% vs 6.89% for DVOL. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DVOL has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVOL.

DVOL has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.

DVOL tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Low Volatility Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DVOL and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVOL and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer