PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMHI vs. CGHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMHI vs. CGHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than CGHM's 2.65% return.


JMHI

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.65%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.66%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGHM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.11%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.10%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMHI vs. CGHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JMHI
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF
1.55%4.60%3.37%
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
2.65%4.56%2.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JMHI and CGHM is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.75

The correlation between JMHI and CGHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMHI vs. CGHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMHI
JMHI Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMHI vs. CGHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMHICGHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.68

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.71

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.65

14.39

-6.74

JMHI vs. CGHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the CGHM Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMHI and CGHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMHICGHMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

3.03

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.15

-0.10

Drawdowns

JMHI vs. CGHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, which is greater than CGHM's maximum drawdown of -5.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and CGHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMHICGHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-5.90%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-2.55%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

0.00%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.25%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.66%

+0.18%

Volatility

JMHI vs. CGHM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMHICGHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

1.03%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

2.21%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23%

3.12%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.49%

4.53%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.49%

4.53%

-0.04%

JMHI vs. CGHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGHM's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMHI vs. CGHM - Dividend Comparison

JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than CGHM's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.80%3.61%1.78%0.00%
JMHI
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF
4.54%4.42%4.49%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMHI and CGHM have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMHI has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to CGHM (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMHI dropped -7.11% vs CGHM's -5.90%.

On 1-year performance, CGHM leads with 9.42% vs 6.41% for JMHI. On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CGHM has performed better with a 9.42% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JMHI.

JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.80% for CGHM.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.34% for CGHM.

CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMHI and CGHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer