PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGHM vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHM achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly higher than HIMFX's -0.45% return.


CGHM

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
0.35%
6M
2.28%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIMFX

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.70%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
1.33%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGHM vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CGHM vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.72

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

0.97

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.87

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

2.64

+0.34

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGHM and HIMFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.72

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.80

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between CGHM and HIMFX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than HIMFX's 4.00% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.76%3.61%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.00%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%

Drawdowns

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, smaller than the maximum HIMFX drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and HIMFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-17.57%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.98%

-5.60%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.70%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-3.21%

+1.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

1.85%

-0.13%

Volatility

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) at 1.08%. This indicates that CGHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

1.08%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

1.87%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

6.36%

-1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.65%

4.78%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.65%

4.62%

+0.03%