PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CGHM vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHM achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than HIMFX's 2.18% return.


CGHM

1D
0.19%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.14%
1Y
9.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HIMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.76%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CGHM and HIMFX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

0.75

The correlation between CGHM and HIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CGHM vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHM
CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.01

2.68

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.42

4.38

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.64

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

3.09

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.89

11.11

+2.78

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGHM Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is comparable to the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGHM and HIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

2.68

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.85

+0.30

Drawdowns

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, smaller than the maximum HIMFX drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and HIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-17.57%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.55%

-2.76%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

-3.17%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.77%

-0.11%

Volatility

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) is 1.04%, while American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that CGHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CGHMHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.10%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

2.25%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

3.08%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

4.82%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

4.60%

-0.07%

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

CGHM vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than HIMFX's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CGHM
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
3.80%3.61%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.24%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


CGHM and HIMFX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIMFX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to CGHM (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGHM dropped -5.90% vs HIMFX's -17.57%.

CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CGHM and HIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer