CGHM vs. NHYM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM).

CGHM and NHYM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGHM is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Jun 25, 2024. NHYM is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Jan 22, 2025.

Performance

CGHM vs. NHYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGHM vs. NHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF	0.55%	4.47%
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF	0.74%	3.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGHM achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than NHYM's 0.74% return.

CGHM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NHYM

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 2.75%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGHM vs. NHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than NHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.

NHYM

Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF

CGHM

Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF

Return for Risk

CGHM vs. NHYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGHM

CGHM Risk / Return Rank: 41
CGHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CGHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
CGHM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CGHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
CGHM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

NHYM

NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 24
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGHM vs. NHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGHM	NHYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	0.56	+0.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.20	0.74	+0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.13	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	0.64	+0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.97	1.45	+1.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGHM vs. NHYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGHM Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the NHYM Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGHM and NHYM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGHM	NHYM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	0.56	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	0.55	+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CGHM and NHYM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGHM vs. NHYM - Dividend Comparison

CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than NHYM's 4.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF	3.75%	3.61%	1.78%
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF	4.59%	4.06%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGHM vs. NHYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, roughly equal to the maximum NHYM drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and NHYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGHM	NHYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-6.11%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.98%	-5.52%	+0.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-1.62%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.89%	+0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	2.45%	-0.72%

Volatility

CGHM vs. NHYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) is 1.49%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) has a volatility of 1.62%. This indicates that CGHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGHM	NHYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	1.62%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.12%	2.70%	-0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.97%	6.36%	-1.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.65%	6.20%	-1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.65%	6.20%	-1.55%