CGHM vs. SHYM
CGHM (Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF) and SHYM (iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CGHM returned 9.38% vs 5.18% for SHYM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGHM charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SHYM.
Performance
CGHM vs. SHYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGHM achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than SHYM's 1.93% return.
CGHM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHYM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
CGHM vs. SHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 2.65% | 4.56% | 2.71% |
SHYM iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | 1.93% | 2.58% | 2.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGHM and SHYM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CGHM and SHYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGHM vs. SHYM — Risk / Return Rank
CGHM
SHYM
CGHM vs. SHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) and iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CGHM | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | 1.74 | +1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.42 | 2.54 | +1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.35 | +0.33 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 2.33 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.89 | 7.86 | +6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CGHM | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | 1.74 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.27 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
CGHM vs. SHYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGHM drawdown since its inception was -5.90%, smaller than the maximum SHYM drawdown of -22.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGHM and SHYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGHM | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -22.55% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.55% | -2.23% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -6.76% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
Volatility
CGHM vs. SHYM - Volatility Comparison
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF (CGHM) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) at 0.77%. This indicates that CGHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGHM | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.77% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 1.81% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14% | 2.99% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 7.07% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 6.95% | -2.42% |
CGHM vs. SHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGHM has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGHM vs. SHYM - Dividend Comparison
CGHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than SHYM's 4.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGHM Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF | 3.80% | 3.61% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHYM iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | 4.30% | 4.55% | 4.35% | 4.35% | 4.01% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGHM and SHYM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CGHM has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to SHYM (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGHM dropped -5.90% vs SHYM's -22.55%.
On 1-year performance, CGHM leads with 9.38% vs 5.18% for SHYM. On fees, CGHM is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, SHYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CGHM has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 5.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CGHM is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SHYM.
SHYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.80% for CGHM.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CGHM and 0.35% for SHYM.
CGHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CGHM and SHYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer