JMHI vs. NHYM
JMHI (JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF) and NHYM (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMHI returned 6.44% vs 8.84% for NHYM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
JMHI vs. NHYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than NHYM's 2.83% return.
JMHI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NHYM
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 3.37%
- 1Y
- 8.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMHI vs. NHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | 1.56% | 3.98% |
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 2.83% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMHI and NHYM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between JMHI and NHYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMHI vs. NHYM — Risk / Return Rank
JMHI
NHYM
JMHI vs. NHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMHI | NHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 2.02 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 3.13 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.42 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 3.18 | -1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 9.32 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMHI | NHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.02 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.77 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
JMHI vs. NHYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, which is greater than NHYM's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and NHYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMHI | NHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -6.11% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -2.77% | -0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -1.74% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.95% | -0.11% |
Volatility
JMHI vs. NHYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) is 1.09%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) has a volatility of 1.34%. This indicates that JMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMHI | NHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 1.34% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 2.65% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 4.39% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 5.94% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 5.94% | -1.44% |
JMHI vs. NHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JMHI and NHYM have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
JMHI vs. NHYM - Dividend Comparison
JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, which matches NHYM's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | 4.54% | 4.42% | 4.49% | 2.48% |
NHYM Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | 4.53% | 4.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMHI and NHYM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NHYM has higher volatility (1.34%) compared to JMHI (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMHI dropped -7.11% vs NHYM's -6.11%.
On 1-year performance, NHYM leads with 8.84% vs 6.44% for JMHI. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, JMHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NHYM has performed better with a 8.84% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMHI and NHYM have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.53% for NHYM.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nuveen.
NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMHI and NHYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer