JMHI vs. HTAX
JMHI (JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF) and HTAX (Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMHI returned 6.44% vs 9.32% for HTAX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMHI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HTAX.
Performance
JMHI vs. HTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HTAX's 3.54% return.
JMHI
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 9.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMHI vs. HTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | 1.56% | 2.56% |
HTAX Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 3.54% | 1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMHI and HTAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JMHI and HTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMHI vs. HTAX — Risk / Return Rank
JMHI
HTAX
JMHI vs. HTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMHI | HTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | 1.99 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.95 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.77 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 8.47 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMHI | HTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 1.99 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.63 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
JMHI vs. HTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, which is greater than HTAX's maximum drawdown of -6.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and HTAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMHI | HTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -6.10% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -3.14% | +0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | 0.00% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -1.78% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 1.03% | -0.19% |
Volatility
JMHI vs. HTAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) is 1.09%, while Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that JMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMHI | HTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 1.42% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | 3.41% | -1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 4.74% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 6.49% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 6.49% | -1.99% |
JMHI vs. HTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMHI vs. HTAX - Dividend Comparison
JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than HTAX's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HTAX Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.48% | 3.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF | 4.54% | 4.42% | 4.49% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMHI and HTAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTAX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JMHI (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMHI dropped -7.11% vs HTAX's -6.10%.
On 1-year performance, HTAX leads with 9.32% vs 6.44% for JMHI. On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JMHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HTAX has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HTAX.
JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.48% for HTAX.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.49% for HTAX.
JMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMHI and HTAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer