PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMHI vs. HTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMHI vs. HTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMHI achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than HTAX's 3.54% return.


JMHI

1D
0.05%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.62%
1Y
6.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HTAX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.16%
YTD
3.54%
6M
3.87%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMHI vs. HTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMHI and HTAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

0.79

The correlation between JMHI and HTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMHI vs. HTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMHI
JMHI Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HTAX
HTAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMHI vs. HTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) and Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMHIHTAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.00

1.99

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.95

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.77

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.55

8.47

-0.91

JMHI vs. HTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the HTAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMHI and HTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMHIHTAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.99

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.63

+0.42

Drawdowns

JMHI vs. HTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMHI drawdown since its inception was -7.11%, which is greater than HTAX's maximum drawdown of -6.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMHI and HTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMHIHTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-6.10%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-3.14%

+0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.78%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.03%

-0.19%

Volatility

JMHI vs. HTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) is 1.09%, while Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that JMHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMHIHTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.42%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

3.41%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

4.74%

-1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

6.49%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

6.49%

-1.99%

JMHI vs. HTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMHI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMHI vs. HTAX - Dividend Comparison

JMHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than HTAX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HTAX
Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.48%3.67%0.00%0.00%
JMHI
JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF
4.54%4.42%4.49%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMHI and HTAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTAX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to JMHI (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMHI dropped -7.11% vs HTAX's -6.10%.

On 1-year performance, HTAX leads with 9.32% vs 6.44% for JMHI. On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JMHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HTAX has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HTAX.

JMHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 4.48% for HTAX.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JMHI and 0.49% for HTAX.

JMHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMHI and HTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer