JMEE vs. RYLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JMEE (JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMEE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while RYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. JMEE is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JMEE returned 17.77%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for RYLD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMEE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

JMEE vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMEE achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 9.51% return.

JMEE

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 18.13%
• 6M: 15.84%
• 1Y: 31.92%
• 3Y*: 17.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RYLD

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 20.74%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: 2.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMEE vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF	18.13%	7.65%	13.65%	18.12%	0.09%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	9.51%	5.65%	10.13%	0.27%	-6.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JMEE and RYLD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022	0.86

The correlation between JMEE and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

JMEE vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMEE	RYLD
Industrials	20.9%	18.0%
Technology	18.3%	19.0%
Financial Services	15.3%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.9%	8.0%
Healthcare	8.9%	16.3%
Real Estate	7.6%	5.9%
Energy	5.0%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.7%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	2.3%
Utilities	2.1%	2.8%
Communication Services	1.7%	2.4%

Return for Risk

JMEE vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMEE

JMEE Risk / Return Rank: 70
JMEE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JMEE Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMEE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
JMEE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JMEE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 68
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMEE vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JMEE	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.96	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	2.76	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.41	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	3.31	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.66	13.37	+0.29

JMEE vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMEE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMEE and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JMEE vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMEE drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMEE and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMEE	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.40%	-41.53%	+16.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.24%	-6.29%	-1.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.40%	-19.05%	-6.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.50%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-8.78%	+3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	1.55%	+0.79%

Volatility

JMEE vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.00%. This indicates that JMEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMEE	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	2.00%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	7.80%	+3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	10.66%	+5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.49%	14.05%	+5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.49%	17.15%	+2.34%

JMEE vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMEE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

JMEE vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

JMEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than RYLD's 11.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF	0.95%	1.13%	0.95%	1.25%	6.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.73%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMEE and RYLD in my portfolio?

JMEE and RYLD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMEE or RYLD?

JMEE has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to RYLD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMEE dropped -25.40% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, JMEE or RYLD?

On 3-year performance, JMEE leads with 17.77% vs 8.72% for RYLD. On fees, JMEE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMEE or RYLD?

Over the 3-year period, JMEE has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 8.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMEE or RYLD?

JMEE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMEE or RYLD?

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 0.95% for JMEE.

What is the main difference between JMEE and RYLD?

JMEE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RYLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMEE and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.