JMEE vs. GRPM
JMEE (JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF) and GRPM (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMEE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while GRPM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400® GARP Index. JMEE is actively managed, while GRPM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JMEE returned 17.47%/yr vs 14.98%/yr for GRPM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JMEE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GRPM.
Performance
JMEE vs. GRPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMEE achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than GRPM's 7.23% return.
JMEE
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRPM
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 7.23%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
JMEE vs. GRPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF | 16.71% | 7.65% | 13.65% | 18.12% | 1.37% |
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 7.23% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMEE and GRPM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between JMEE and GRPM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
JMEE vs. GRPM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JMEE
GRPM
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
JMEE
GRPM
Financial Services
JMEE
GRPM
Technology
JMEE
GRPM
Consumer Cyclical
JMEE
GRPM
Healthcare
JMEE
GRPM
Real Estate
JMEE
GRPM
-
Energy
JMEE
GRPM
Basic Materials
JMEE
GRPM
-
Consumer Defensive
JMEE
GRPM
Utilities
JMEE
GRPM
-
Communication Services
JMEE
GRPM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMEE vs. GRPM — Risk / Return Rank
JMEE
GRPM
JMEE vs. GRPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMEE | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.08 | 1.52 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.97 | 2.23 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.22 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 9.53 | +4.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMEE | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.52 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.55 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
JMEE vs. GRPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMEE drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, smaller than the maximum GRPM drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMEE and GRPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMEE | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -43.12% | +17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.24% | -7.62% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.40% | -28.09% | +2.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -5.71% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.57% | -0.23% |
Volatility
JMEE vs. GRPM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF (JMEE) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF (GRPM) at 3.83%. This indicates that JMEE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMEE | GRPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 3.83% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.27% | 10.44% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 16.13% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 20.90% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 22.25% | -2.74% |
JMEE vs. GRPM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMEE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GRPM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMEE vs. GRPM - Dividend Comparison
JMEE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, which matches GRPM's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRPM Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
JMEE JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.13% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 6.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMEE and GRPM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMEE has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to GRPM (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMEE dropped -25.40% vs GRPM's -43.12%.
On 3-year performance, JMEE leads with 17.47% vs 14.98% for GRPM. On fees, JMEE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, GRPM has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JMEE has performed better with a 17.47% return vs 14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMEE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GRPM.
JMEE and GRPM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.96%.
JMEE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while GRPM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMEE and 0.35% for GRPM.
JMEE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JMEE and GRPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer