JLL vs. NMRK
JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated) and NMRK (Newmark Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Real Estate - Services industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, JLL returned 9.79%/yr vs 4.17%/yr for NMRK. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
JLL vs. NMRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than NMRK's -13.01% return.
JLL
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.48%
NMRK
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -15.40%
- YTD
- -13.01%
- 1Y
- 0.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $145.24M | $131.95M | $122.40M | |
| $22.53M | $19.86M | $21.02M |
JLL vs. NMRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 5.52% | 32.92% | 34.03% | 18.51% | -40.83% | 81.53% | -14.77% | 38.32% | -14.54% | 2.37% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | -13.01% | 36.47% | 18.06% | 39.87% | -56.96% | 157.32% | -44.91% | 74.73% | -48.39% | 13.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLL and NMRK is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.70 |
The correlation between JLL and NMRK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
JLL:
$16.47B
NMRK:
$2.34B
JLL:
$15.30
NMRK:
$0.47
JLL:
23.20
NMRK:
31.77
JLL:
0.97
NMRK:
17.33
JLL:
0.62
NMRK:
1.06
JLL:
2.25
NMRK:
2.18
JLL:
$27.43B
NMRK:
$3.60B
JLL:
$18.58B
NMRK:
$1.82B
JLL:
$1.26B
NMRK:
$437.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLL vs. NMRK — Risk / Return Rank
JLL
NMRK
JLL vs. NMRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JLL | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.03 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.01 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | -0.01 | +3.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JLL vs. NMRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, roughly equal to the maximum NMRK drawdown of -83.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and NMRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLL | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.92% | -83.84% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.89% | -29.08% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.59% | -36.60% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | -71.92% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -22.82% | +20.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.82% | -35.47% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 17.03% | -7.04% |
Volatility
JLL vs. NMRK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is 10.60%, while Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) has a volatility of 12.82%. This indicates that JLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLL | NMRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 12.82% | -2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 31.30% | -2.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.32% | 38.05% | -3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 42.82% | -7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.12% | 56.74% | -20.62% |
Dividends
JLL vs. NMRK - Dividend Comparison
JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.35% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.25% | 0.21% | 1.78% | 2.90% | 3.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
JLL vs. NMRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Newmark Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JLL vs. NMRK - Profitability Comparison
JLL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 915.40M and revenue of 6.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.2%.
NMRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of -800.93M and revenue of 887.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -90.2%.
JLL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 285.60M and revenue of 6.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
NMRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 40.41M and revenue of 887.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
JLL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of -50.10M and revenue of 6.93B, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.
NMRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a net income of -8.51M and revenue of 887.78M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JLL and NMRK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMRK has higher volatility (12.82%) compared to JLL (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLL dropped -85.92% vs NMRK's -83.84%.
JLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLL and NMRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer