PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLL vs. NMRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JLL vs. NMRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly higher than NMRK's -14.25% return.


JLL

1D
-0.82%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-12.37%
6M
-13.40%
1Y
23.64%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
11.28%

NMRK

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-14.25%
6M
-14.99%
1Y
33.70%
3Y*
37.35%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLL vs. NMRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
-12.37%32.92%34.03%18.51%-40.83%81.53%-14.77%38.32%-14.54%2.37%
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
-14.25%36.47%18.06%39.87%-56.96%157.32%-44.91%74.73%-48.39%13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and NMRK is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.70

The correlation between JLL and NMRK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JLL:

$14.09B

NMRK:

$3.78B

EPS

JLL:

$18.60

NMRK:

$0.59

PE Ratio

JLL:

15.85

NMRK:

25.16

PEG Ratio

JLL:

0.67

NMRK:

13.72

PS Ratio

JLL:

0.53

NMRK:

1.08

PB Ratio

JLL:

1.93

NMRK:

2.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

JLL:

$26.76B

NMRK:

$3.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JLL:

$14.76B

NMRK:

$3.38B

EBITDA (TTM)

JLL:

$1.33B

NMRK:

$459.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLL vs. NMRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL
JLL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

NMRK
NMRK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NMRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMRK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NMRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMRK Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLL vs. NMRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLLNMRKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.16

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

2.18

+0.34

JLL vs. NMRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the NMRK Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and NMRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLL vs. NMRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, roughly equal to the maximum NMRK drawdown of -83.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and NMRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLLNMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.92%

-83.84%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.89%

-29.08%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.59%

-36.60%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.54%

-71.92%

+16.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.79%

-23.92%

+6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.90%

-35.66%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.42%

15.53%

-6.11%

Volatility

JLL vs. NMRK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is 8.13%, while Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that JLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLLNMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

9.38%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.08%

30.02%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.66%

38.12%

-4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.07%

42.71%

-7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.35%

56.94%

-20.59%

Dividends

JLL vs. NMRK - Dividend Comparison

JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.49%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
1.01%0.69%0.94%1.09%1.25%0.21%1.78%2.90%3.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

JLL vs. NMRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Newmark Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
6.39B
847.16M
(JLL) Total Revenue
(NMRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JLL vs. NMRK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Newmark Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
54.0%
94.5%
Portfolio components
JLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 3.45B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

NMRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 800.93M and revenue of 847.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.5%.

JLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 204.60M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

NMRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.96M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

JLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 159.00M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

NMRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.42M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JLL and NMRK have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMRK has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to JLL (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLL dropped -85.92% vs NMRK's -83.84%.

NMRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLL and NMRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer