NMRK vs. CWK
NMRK (Newmark Group, Inc.) and CWK (Cushman & Wakefield plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Real Estate - Services industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 5 years, NMRK returned 3.73%/yr vs -6.42%/yr for CWK. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
NMRK vs. CWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMRK achieves a -14.25% return, which is significantly higher than CWK's -21.06% return.
NMRK
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- -14.25%
- 6M
- -14.99%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 37.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CWK
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -21.06%
- 6M
- -21.83%
- 1Y
- 21.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- -6.42%
- 10Y*
- —
NMRK vs. CWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | -14.25% | 36.47% | 18.06% | 39.87% | -56.96% | 157.32% | -44.91% | 74.73% | -41.04% |
CWK Cushman & Wakefield plc | -21.06% | 23.78% | 21.11% | -13.32% | -43.97% | 49.97% | -27.45% | 41.26% | -19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMRK and CWK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between NMRK and CWK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
NMRK:
$3.78B
CWK:
$3.01B
NMRK:
$0.59
CWK:
$0.31
NMRK:
25.16
CWK:
40.79
NMRK:
13.72
CWK:
0.00
NMRK:
1.08
CWK:
0.29
NMRK:
2.24
CWK:
1.54
NMRK:
$3.48B
CWK:
$10.54B
NMRK:
$3.38B
CWK:
$1.39B
NMRK:
$459.76M
CWK:
$309.80M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMRK vs. CWK — Risk / Return Rank
NMRK
CWK
NMRK vs. CWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NMRK | CWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.70 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.18 | 1.47 | +0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NMRK vs. CWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMRK drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than CWK's maximum drawdown of -71.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMRK and CWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMRK | CWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.84% | -71.84% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.08% | -31.40% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.60% | -48.97% | +12.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.92% | -71.84% | -0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.92% | -44.72% | +20.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.66% | -32.92% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.53% | 14.98% | +0.55% |
Volatility
NMRK vs. CWK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) is 9.38%, while Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that NMRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMRK | CWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 11.44% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.02% | 34.94% | -4.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.12% | 43.17% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.71% | 42.68% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.94% | 47.15% | +9.79% |
Dividends
NMRK vs. CWK - Dividend Comparison
NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while CWK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWK Cushman & Wakefield plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | 1.01% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.25% | 0.21% | 1.78% | 2.90% | 3.37% |
Financials
NMRK vs. CWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmark Group, Inc. and Cushman & Wakefield plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NMRK vs. CWK - Profitability Comparison
NMRK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 800.93M and revenue of 847.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.5%.
CWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NMRK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.96M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
CWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported an operating income of 58.70M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.
NMRK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.42M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.
CWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cushman & Wakefield plc reported a net income of -12.60M and revenue of 2.54B, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NMRK and CWK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWK has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to NMRK (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMRK dropped -83.84% vs CWK's -71.84%.
NMRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMRK and CWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer