JLL vs. CBRE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE).

Performance

JLL vs. CBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JLL vs. CBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated	-9.56%	32.92%	34.03%	18.51%	-40.83%	81.53%	-14.77%	38.32%	-14.54%	48.19%
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc.	-15.75%	22.47%	41.04%	20.96%	-29.08%	73.01%	2.33%	53.07%	-7.55%	37.54%

Fundamentals

EPS JLL : $16.41 CBRE : $5.75
PE Ratio JLL : 18.55 CBRE : 23.54
PS Ratio JLL : 0.56 CBRE : 0.67
Total Revenue (TTM) JLL : $26.12B CBRE : $40.55B
Gross Profit (TTM) JLL : $14.19B CBRE : $14.93B
EBITDA (TTM) JLL : $1.52B CBRE : $2.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly higher than CBRE's -15.75% return. Over the past 10 years, JLL has underperformed CBRE with an annualized return of 10.17%, while CBRE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.62% annualized return.

JLL

• 1D: 2.46%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -9.56%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: 27.89%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 10.17%

CBRE

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -8.26%
• YTD: -15.75%
• 6M: -14.03%
• 1Y: 3.58%
• 3Y*: 22.99%
• 5Y*: 11.09%
• 10Y*: 16.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

JLL vs. CBRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL

JLL Risk / Return Rank: 63
JLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JLL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
JLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JLL Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CBRE

CBRE Risk / Return Rank: 44
CBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
CBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
CBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLL vs. CBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JLL	CBRE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	0.11	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	0.37	+0.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.05	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	0.20	+0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	0.55	+2.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JLL vs. CBRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the CBRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and CBRE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JLL	CBRE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	0.11	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.37	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.51	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.30	-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and CBRE is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

JLL vs. CBRE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JLL nor CBRE has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	0.65%	0.48%	0.63%	0.35%
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

JLL vs. CBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, smaller than the maximum CBRE drawdown of -94.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and CBRE.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLL	CBRE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.92%	-94.31%	+8.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.89%	-23.22%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	-40.38%	-15.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.54%	-53.57%	-1.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.15%	-21.07%	+5.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.04%	-26.65%	-4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	8.49%	-0.29%

Volatility

JLL vs. CBRE - Volatility Comparison

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) at 7.10%. This indicates that JLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLL	CBRE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	7.10%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.90%	24.30%	+2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.29%	32.09%	+3.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.72%	30.00%	+4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.34%	32.94%	+3.40%

Financials

JLL vs. CBRE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and CBRE Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

JLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.83B and revenue of 7.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

CBRE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.16B and revenue of 11.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

JLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 506.90M and revenue of 7.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

CBRE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 623.00M and revenue of 11.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

JLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 401.70M and revenue of 7.61B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

CBRE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a net income of 416.00M and revenue of 11.63B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.