PortfoliosLab logo
JLL vs. CBRE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and CBRE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

JLL vs. CBRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JLL:

0.54

CBRE:

1.47

Sortino Ratio

JLL:

1.09

CBRE:

2.13

Omega Ratio

JLL:

1.13

CBRE:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

JLL:

0.68

CBRE:

2.05

Martin Ratio

JLL:

2.25

CBRE:

6.13

Ulcer Index

JLL:

9.18%

CBRE:

7.55%

Daily Std Dev

JLL:

34.64%

CBRE:

30.72%

Max Drawdown

JLL:

-85.93%

CBRE:

-94.31%

Current Drawdown

JLL:

-19.36%

CBRE:

-13.96%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JLL:

$11.06B

CBRE:

$37.73B

EPS

JLL:

$11.29

CBRE:

$3.27

PE Ratio

JLL:

20.62

CBRE:

38.71

PEG Ratio

JLL:

0.73

CBRE:

0.89

PS Ratio

JLL:

0.47

CBRE:

1.02

PB Ratio

JLL:

1.60

CBRE:

4.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

JLL:

$24.05B

CBRE:

$36.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JLL:

$12.38B

CBRE:

$7.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

JLL:

$970.10M

CBRE:

$2.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than CBRE's -3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, JLL has underperformed CBRE with an annualized return of 3.90%, while CBRE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.


JLL

YTD

-9.29%

1M

2.75%

6M

-14.65%

1Y

18.43%

5Y*

17.17%

10Y*

3.90%

CBRE

YTD

-3.58%

1M

4.39%

6M

-6.97%

1Y

44.77%

5Y*

24.99%

10Y*

12.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

JLL vs. CBRE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLL is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLL is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLL is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLL is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLL is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CBRE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CBRE is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CBRE is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CBRE is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CBRE is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CBRE is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CBRE is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JLL vs. CBRE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the CBRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and CBRE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

JLL vs. CBRE - Dividend Comparison

Neither JLL nor CBRE has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.59%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%0.47%
CBRE
CBRE Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JLL vs. CBRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, smaller than the maximum CBRE drawdown of -94.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and CBRE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

JLL vs. CBRE - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

JLL vs. CBRE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and CBRE Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
5.75B
8.91B
(JLL) Total Revenue
(CBRE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items