JLL vs. CBRE
JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated) and CBRE (CBRE Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Real Estate - Services industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, JLL returned 12.44%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for CBRE. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
JLL vs. CBRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than CBRE's -8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, JLL has underperformed CBRE with an annualized return of 12.44%, while CBRE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.89% annualized return.
JLL
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 28.94%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.48%
CBRE
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 3.69%
- 6M
- -13.81%
- YTD
- -8.69%
- 1Y
- -4.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | $292.01M | $255.68M | $301.89M |
| $145.24M | $131.95M | $122.40M |
JLL vs. CBRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 5.52% | 32.92% | 34.03% | 18.51% | -40.83% | 81.53% | -14.77% | 38.32% | -14.54% | 48.19% |
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | -8.69% | 22.47% | 41.04% | 20.96% | -29.08% | 73.01% | 2.33% | 53.07% | -7.55% | 37.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLL and CBRE is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2004 | 0.74 |
The correlation between JLL and CBRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
JLL:
$16.47B
CBRE:
$42.99B
JLL:
$15.30
CBRE:
$5.80
JLL:
23.20
CBRE:
25.31
JLL:
0.62
CBRE:
0.75
JLL:
$27.43B
CBRE:
$43.64B
JLL:
$18.58B
CBRE:
$7.71B
JLL:
$1.26B
CBRE:
$2.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLL vs. CBRE — Risk / Return Rank
JLL
CBRE
JLL vs. CBRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JLL | CBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.99 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | -0.21 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | -0.42 | +3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JLL vs. CBRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, smaller than the maximum CBRE drawdown of -94.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and CBRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLL | CBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.92% | -94.31% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.89% | -27.37% | +5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.59% | -27.37% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | -40.38% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.54% | -53.57% | -1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -14.45% | +12.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.82% | -26.53% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 13.71% | -3.72% |
Volatility
JLL vs. CBRE - Volatility Comparison
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) have volatilities of 10.60% and 10.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLL | CBRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 10.62% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.29% | 27.39% | +1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.32% | 31.02% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.18% | 30.41% | +4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.12% | 32.74% | +3.38% |
Dividends
JLL vs. CBRE - Dividend Comparison
Neither JLL nor CBRE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRE CBRE Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.35% |
Financials
JLL vs. CBRE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and CBRE Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JLL vs. CBRE - Profitability Comparison
JLL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 915.40M and revenue of 6.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.2%.
CBRE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 11.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.
JLL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 285.60M and revenue of 6.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
CBRE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 365.00M and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
JLL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of -50.10M and revenue of 6.93B, resulting in a net margin of -0.7%.
CBRE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CBRE Group, Inc. reported a net income of 204.00M and revenue of 11.23B, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JLL and CBRE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBRE has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to JLL (10.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLL dropped -85.92% vs CBRE's -94.31%.
JLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLL and CBRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer