PortfoliosLab logo
JLL vs. FPH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and FPH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

JLL vs. FPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JLL:

0.54

FPH:

1.31

Sortino Ratio

JLL:

1.09

FPH:

2.72

Omega Ratio

JLL:

1.13

FPH:

1.33

Calmar Ratio

JLL:

0.68

FPH:

0.89

Martin Ratio

JLL:

2.25

FPH:

6.18

Ulcer Index

JLL:

9.18%

FPH:

11.82%

Daily Std Dev

JLL:

34.64%

FPH:

58.41%

Max Drawdown

JLL:

-85.93%

FPH:

-87.96%

Current Drawdown

JLL:

-19.36%

FPH:

-67.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JLL:

$10.90B

FPH:

$783.45M

EPS

JLL:

$11.07

FPH:

$1.25

PE Ratio

JLL:

20.74

FPH:

4.30

PEG Ratio

JLL:

0.73

FPH:

0.00

PS Ratio

JLL:

0.45

FPH:

3.25

PB Ratio

JLL:

1.59

FPH:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

JLL:

$24.05B

FPH:

$241.15M

Gross Profit (TTM)

JLL:

$12.38B

FPH:

$132.72M

EBITDA (TTM)

JLL:

$970.10M

FPH:

$102.39M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FPH's 42.33% return.


JLL

YTD

-9.29%

1M

7.65%

6M

-14.65%

1Y

17.25%

5Y*

18.15%

10Y*

3.69%

FPH

YTD

42.33%

1M

13.26%

6M

39.74%

1Y

74.68%

5Y*

0.45%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

JLL vs. FPH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLL is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLL is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLL is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLL is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLL is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FPH is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FPH is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FPH is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FPH is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FPH is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FPH is 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JLL vs. FPH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the FPH Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and FPH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

JLL vs. FPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither JLL nor FPH has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.59%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%0.47%
FPH
Five Point Holdings, LLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JLL vs. FPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FPH drawdown of -87.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and FPH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

JLL vs. FPH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is 9.36%, while Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) has a volatility of 14.66%. This indicates that JLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

JLL vs. FPH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Five Point Holdings, LLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
5.75B
13.16M
(JLL) Total Revenue
(FPH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items