JLL vs. FPH
Compare and contrast key facts about Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH).
Performance
JLL vs. FPH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JLL vs. FPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | -9.56% | 32.92% | 34.03% | 18.51% | -40.83% | 81.53% | -14.77% | 38.32% | -14.54% | 24.67% |
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC | -13.42% | 47.88% | 23.13% | 31.76% | -64.37% | 19.78% | -21.44% | 0.14% | -50.78% | -6.25% |
Fundamentals
JLL:
$14.66B
FPH:
$727.49M
JLL:
$16.41
FPH:
$0.83
JLL:
18.55
FPH:
5.83
JLL:
0.78
FPH:
0.02
JLL:
0.56
FPH:
6.57
JLL:
1.95
FPH:
0.33
JLL:
$26.12B
FPH:
$110.02M
JLL:
$14.19B
FPH:
$53.23M
JLL:
$1.52B
FPH:
$46.56M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -9.56% return, which is significantly higher than FPH's -13.42% return.
JLL
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- YTD
- -9.56%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 27.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
FPH
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- YTD
- -13.42%
- 6M
- -21.04%
- 1Y
- -9.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- -8.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLL vs. FPH — Risk / Return Rank
JLL
FPH
JLL vs. FPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLL | FPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | -0.26 | +0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.06 | -0.13 | +1.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | -0.32 | +1.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | -0.74 | +3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLL | FPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | -0.26 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.18 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.25 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between JLL and FPH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
JLL vs. FPH - Dividend Comparison
Neither JLL nor FPH has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.35% |
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JLL vs. FPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FPH drawdown of -87.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and FPH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLL | FPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.92% | -87.96% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.89% | -27.12% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | -77.32% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.15% | -70.58% | +55.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.04% | -60.41% | +29.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.20% | 11.74% | -3.54% |
Volatility
JLL vs. FPH - Volatility Comparison
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) at 6.77%. This indicates that JLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JLL | FPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 6.77% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.90% | 18.32% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.29% | 35.96% | -0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.72% | 47.08% | -12.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.34% | 47.83% | -11.49% |
Financials
JLL vs. FPH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Five Point Holdings, LLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities