JLL vs. FPH

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated) and FPH (Five Point Holdings, LLC) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — JLL in Real Estate - Services, FPH in Real Estate - Development. Over the past 5 years, JLL returned 7.74%/yr vs -9.19%/yr for FPH. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

JLL vs. FPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than FPH's -10.73% return.

JLL

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: -12.37%
• 6M: -13.40%
• 1Y: 23.64%
• 3Y*: 26.39%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

FPH

• 1D: -2.54%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: -10.73%
• 6M: -8.78%
• 1Y: -9.27%
• 3Y*: 23.18%
• 5Y*: -9.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLL vs. FPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated	-12.37%	32.92%	34.03%	18.51%	-40.83%	81.53%	-14.77%	38.32%	-14.54%	23.66%
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC	-10.73%	47.88%	23.13%	31.76%	-64.37%	19.78%	-21.44%	0.14%	-50.78%	-7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and FPH is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017	0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap JLL : $14.09B FPH : $3.57B
EPS JLL : $18.60 FPH : $0.14
PE Ratio JLL : 15.85 FPH : 35.55
PEG Ratio JLL : 0.67 FPH : 0.10
PS Ratio JLL : 0.53 FPH : 13.14
PB Ratio JLL : 1.93 FPH : 1.64
Total Revenue (TTM) JLL : $26.76B FPH : $110.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) JLL : $14.76B FPH : $44.62M
EBITDA (TTM) JLL : $1.33B FPH : $2.04M

Return for Risk

JLL vs. FPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL

JLL Risk / Return Rank: 63
JLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
JLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JLL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
JLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
JLL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FPH

FPH Risk / Return Rank: 29
FPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FPH Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FPH Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLL vs. FPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JLL	FPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	-0.29	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	-0.18	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.98	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	-0.34	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.52	-0.59	+3.10

JLL vs. FPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the FPH Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and FPH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JLL vs. FPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FPH drawdown of -87.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and FPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	JLL	FPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.92%	-87.96%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.89%	-27.43%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.59%	-39.27%	+8.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.54%	-77.32%	+21.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.79%	-69.67%	+51.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.90%	-60.61%	+29.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.42%	15.79%	-6.37%

Volatility

JLL vs. FPH - Volatility Comparison

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) at 6.76%. This indicates that JLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JLL	FPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	6.76%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.08%	19.64%	+8.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.66%	32.34%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.07%	46.80%	-11.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.35%	47.43%	-11.08%

Dividends

JLL vs. FPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither JLL nor FPH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.49%	0.65%	0.48%	0.63%	0.35%

Financials

JLL vs. FPH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Five Point Holdings, LLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

JLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 3.45B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.

FPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Point Holdings, LLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

JLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 204.60M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

FPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Point Holdings, LLC reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 13.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

JLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 159.00M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

FPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Point Holdings, LLC reported a net income of -6.85M and revenue of 13.58M, resulting in a net margin of -50.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JLL and FPH in my portfolio?

JLL and FPH have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JLL or FPH?

JLL has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to FPH (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLL dropped -85.92% vs FPH's -87.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.