NMRK vs. TCI
Compare and contrast key facts about Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI).
Performance
NMRK vs. TCI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMRK vs. TCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | -13.94% | 36.47% | 18.06% | 39.87% | -56.96% | 157.32% | -44.91% | 74.73% | -48.39% | 13.98% |
TCI Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. | -40.84% | 96.65% | -13.74% | -21.77% | 12.99% | 62.17% | -39.54% | 40.82% | -9.58% | -7.86% |
Fundamentals
NMRK:
$3.79B
TCI:
$299.61M
NMRK:
$0.12
TCI:
$1.60
NMRK:
129.11
TCI:
21.71
NMRK:
70.41
TCI:
0.02
NMRK:
1.15
TCI:
6.11
NMRK:
2.16
TCI:
0.35
NMRK:
$3.29B
TCI:
$49.06M
NMRK:
$2.29B
TCI:
$0.00
NMRK:
$289.22M
TCI:
$12.65M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMRK achieves a -13.94% return, which is significantly higher than TCI's -40.84% return.
NMRK
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- -13.94%
- 6M
- -19.15%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
TCI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- -40.84%
- 6M
- -24.82%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- -6.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMRK vs. TCI — Risk / Return Rank
NMRK
TCI
NMRK vs. TCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMRK | TCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 0.47 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 0.99 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.55 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 1.67 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMRK | TCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.47 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.22 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMRK and TCI is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NMRK vs. TCI - Dividend Comparison
NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while TCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMRK Newmark Group, Inc. | 0.81% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 1.09% | 1.25% | 0.21% | 1.78% | 2.90% | 3.37% |
TCI Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NMRK vs. TCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMRK drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, smaller than the maximum TCI drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMRK and TCI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMRK | TCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.84% | -92.97% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.08% | -43.81% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.92% | -45.36% | -26.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.65% | -41.13% | +17.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -31.86% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.77% | 14.43% | -1.66% |
Volatility
NMRK vs. TCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) is 10.20%, while Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) has a volatility of 19.04%. This indicates that NMRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMRK | TCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.20% | 19.04% | -8.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.94% | 40.47% | -11.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.90% | 51.58% | -10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.75% | 41.37% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.37% | 53.04% | +4.33% |
Financials
NMRK vs. TCI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmark Group, Inc. and Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities