PortfoliosLab logo
JLL vs. ACU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and ACU is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

JLL vs. ACU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JLL:

0.39

ACU:

0.43

Sortino Ratio

JLL:

0.74

ACU:

0.46

Omega Ratio

JLL:

1.09

ACU:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

JLL:

0.42

ACU:

0.13

Martin Ratio

JLL:

1.16

ACU:

0.39

Ulcer Index

JLL:

10.22%

ACU:

11.13%

Daily Std Dev

JLL:

35.06%

ACU:

36.53%

Max Drawdown

JLL:

-85.93%

ACU:

-90.63%

Current Drawdown

JLL:

-21.81%

ACU:

-17.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JLL:

$10.56B

ACU:

$149.47M

EPS

JLL:

$10.96

ACU:

$2.47

PE Ratio

JLL:

20.08

ACU:

15.96

PEG Ratio

JLL:

0.70

ACU:

1.43

PS Ratio

JLL:

0.44

ACU:

0.76

PB Ratio

JLL:

1.53

ACU:

1.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

JLL:

$24.05B

ACU:

$195.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

JLL:

$21.18B

ACU:

$76.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

JLL:

$1.18B

ACU:

$18.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -12.04% return, which is significantly lower than ACU's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, JLL has underperformed ACU with an annualized return of 2.78%, while ACU has yielded a comparatively higher 10.57% annualized return.


JLL

YTD

-12.04%

1M

-2.50%

6M

-21.10%

1Y

13.58%

3Y*

3.34%

5Y*

16.81%

10Y*

2.78%

ACU

YTD

9.13%

1M

1.33%

6M

-8.14%

1Y

15.58%

3Y*

9.06%

5Y*

15.60%

10Y*

10.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated

Acme United Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JLL vs. ACU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLL is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLL is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLL is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLL is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLL is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLL is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ACU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACU is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACU is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACU is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACU is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACU is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACU is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JLL vs. ACU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the ACU Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and ACU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

JLL vs. ACU - Dividend Comparison

JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.59%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%0.47%
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.48%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%1.65%

Drawdowns

JLL vs. ACU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, smaller than the maximum ACU drawdown of -90.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and ACU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

JLL vs. ACU - Volatility Comparison

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a higher volatility of 9.49% compared to Acme United Corporation (ACU) at 7.29%. This indicates that JLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

JLL vs. ACU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Acme United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
5.75B
45.96M
(JLL) Total Revenue
(ACU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

JLL vs. ACU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Acme United Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
39.0%
(JLL) Gross Margin
(ACU) Gross Margin
JLL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.75B and revenue of 5.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ACU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 17.92M and revenue of 45.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

JLL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 120.00M and revenue of 5.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

ACU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 2.43M and revenue of 45.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

JLL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 55.30M and revenue of 5.75B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

ACU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 1.65M and revenue of 45.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.