PortfoliosLab logo
JLL vs. ACU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between JLL and ACU is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

JLL vs. ACU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JLL:

0.54

ACU:

-0.20

Sortino Ratio

JLL:

1.09

ACU:

-0.16

Omega Ratio

JLL:

1.13

ACU:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

JLL:

0.68

ACU:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

JLL:

2.25

ACU:

-0.81

Ulcer Index

JLL:

9.18%

ACU:

12.57%

Daily Std Dev

JLL:

34.64%

ACU:

37.52%

Max Drawdown

JLL:

-85.93%

ACU:

-90.63%

Current Drawdown

JLL:

-19.36%

ACU:

-22.88%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JLL:

$11.06B

ACU:

$141.69M

EPS

JLL:

$11.29

ACU:

$2.47

PE Ratio

JLL:

20.62

ACU:

15.28

PEG Ratio

JLL:

0.73

ACU:

1.43

PS Ratio

JLL:

0.47

ACU:

0.72

PB Ratio

JLL:

1.60

ACU:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

JLL:

$24.05B

ACU:

$195.49M

Gross Profit (TTM)

JLL:

$12.38B

ACU:

$76.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

JLL:

$970.10M

ACU:

$18.71M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than ACU's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, JLL has underperformed ACU with an annualized return of 3.90%, while ACU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.


JLL

YTD

-9.29%

1M

2.75%

6M

-14.65%

1Y

18.43%

5Y*

17.17%

10Y*

3.90%

ACU

YTD

2.25%

1M

-5.32%

6M

-8.05%

1Y

-7.45%

5Y*

13.91%

10Y*

9.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

JLL vs. ACU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLL is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLL is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLL is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLL is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLL is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLL is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ACU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACU is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACU is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACU is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACU is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACU is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACU is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JLL vs. ACU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the ACU Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLL and ACU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

JLL vs. ACU - Dividend Comparison

JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.59%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%0.47%
ACU
Acme United Corporation
1.58%1.61%1.31%2.47%1.54%1.59%2.02%3.09%1.79%1.56%2.07%1.65%

Drawdowns

JLL vs. ACU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.93%, smaller than the maximum ACU drawdown of -90.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and ACU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

JLL vs. ACU - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

JLL vs. ACU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Acme United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
5.75B
45.96M
(JLL) Total Revenue
(ACU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items