JLL vs. ACU
JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated) and ACU (Acme United Corporation) are both stocks. JLL operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate), while ACU operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, JLL returned 11.28%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for ACU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JLL vs. ACU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLL achieves a -12.37% return, which is significantly lower than ACU's 12.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JLL having a 11.28% annualized return and ACU not far ahead at 11.55%.
JLL
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- -13.40%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
ACU
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- 12.66%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 17.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
JLL vs. ACU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | -12.37% | 32.92% | 34.03% | 18.51% | -40.83% | 81.53% | -14.77% | 38.32% | -14.54% | 48.19% |
ACU Acme United Corporation | 12.66% | 9.67% | -11.61% | 100.21% | -33.82% | 13.48% | 29.39% | 71.41% | -37.83% | -6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLL and ACU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 1997 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, JLL and ACU have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
JLL:
$14.09B
ACU:
$187.31M
JLL:
$18.60
ACU:
$2.07
JLL:
15.85
ACU:
21.75
JLL:
0.67
ACU:
0.25
JLL:
0.53
ACU:
1.23
JLL:
1.93
ACU:
1.60K
JLL:
$26.76B
ACU:
$150.64M
JLL:
$14.76B
ACU:
$59.51M
JLL:
$1.33B
ACU:
$17.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLL vs. ACU — Risk / Return Rank
JLL
ACU
JLL vs. ACU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) and Acme United Corporation (ACU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JLL | ACU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.85 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 2.00 | +0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JLL vs. ACU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLL drawdown since its inception was -85.92%, smaller than the maximum ACU drawdown of -91.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLL and ACU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLL | ACU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.92% | -91.05% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.89% | -20.05% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.59% | -32.71% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.54% | -51.48% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.54% | -52.47% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.79% | -6.81% | -10.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.90% | -38.91% | +8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.42% | 8.53% | +0.89% |
Volatility
JLL vs. ACU - Volatility Comparison
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Acme United Corporation (ACU) at 7.11%. This indicates that JLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLL | ACU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.13% | 7.11% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.08% | 19.47% | +8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.66% | 31.96% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.07% | 40.38% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.35% | 42.39% | -6.04% |
Dividends
JLL vs. ACU - Dividend Comparison
JLL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACU Acme United Corporation | 1.42% | 1.54% | 1.61% | 1.31% | 2.47% | 1.54% | 1.59% | 2.02% | 3.09% | 1.79% | 1.56% | 2.07% |
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.35% |
Financials
JLL vs. ACU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated and Acme United Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
JLL vs. ACU - Profitability Comparison
JLL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 3.45B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
ACU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a gross profit of 20.79K and revenue of 52.30K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.
JLL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 204.60M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
ACU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported an operating income of 1.75K and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
JLL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 159.00M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.
ACU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acme United Corporation reported a net income of 985.00 and revenue of 52.30K, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
JLL and ACU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JLL has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to ACU (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLL dropped -85.92% vs ACU's -91.05%.
JLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLL and ACU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer