JIVE vs. EFAV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

JIVE (Jpmorgan International Value ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. JIVE is actively managed, while EFAV is passively managed. Over the past year, JIVE returned 43.55% vs 9.18% for EFAV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JIVE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.

Performance

JIVE vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIVE achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 4.53% return.

JIVE

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 6M: 21.63%
• 1Y: 43.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAV

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 4.53%
• 6M: 6.20%
• 1Y: 9.18%
• 3Y*: 13.13%
• 5Y*: 6.49%
• 10Y*: 6.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIVE vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF	16.94%	49.80%	11.22%	5.38%
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	4.53%	26.00%	5.30%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JIVE and EFAV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.79

The correlation between JIVE and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

JIVE vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JIVE	EFAV
Financial Services	33.4%	19.9%
Energy	8.9%	8.2%
Industrials	7.4%	15.1%
Technology	6.9%	4.5%
Basic Materials	5.4%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.3%	5.2%
Healthcare	4.3%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	11.5%
Communication Services	2.8%	9.7%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.9%
Utilities	1.8%	9.1%

Return for Risk

JIVE vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIVE

JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 85
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EFAV

EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 27
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIVE vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JIVE	EFAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.04	0.89	+2.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.99	1.30	+2.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.16	+0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.28	1.59	+2.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.61	4.53	+12.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JIVE vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIVE Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIVE and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JIVE	EFAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.04	0.89	+2.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.04	0.54	+1.51

Drawdowns

JIVE vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIVE drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIVE and EFAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIVE	EFAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.79%	-27.56%	+13.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	-6.46%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.96%	+4.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-4.77%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.27%	+0.45%

Volatility

JIVE vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.27%. This indicates that JIVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIVE	EFAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	3.27%	+1.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	8.15%	+3.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.45%	10.37%	+4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.96%	11.79%	+3.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	13.21%	+1.75%

JIVE vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIVE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIVE vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

JIVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than EFAV's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.24%	3.08%	2.53%	2.47%	1.33%	4.19%	3.34%	2.45%	3.94%	2.49%
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF	2.46%	2.88%	2.48%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIVE and EFAV in my portfolio?

JIVE and EFAV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIVE or EFAV?

JIVE has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to EFAV (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIVE dropped -13.79% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

Which ETF is better, JIVE or EFAV?

On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 43.55% vs 9.18% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JIVE or EFAV?

Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 43.55% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JIVE or EFAV?

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JIVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JIVE or EFAV?

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.46% for JIVE.

What is the main difference between JIVE and EFAV?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JIVE and 0.20% for EFAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.