JILCX vs. JAAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX).
JILCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. JAAAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 1, 2009.
Performance
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | -1.46% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 2.10% | 6.18% | 6.59% | 5.85% | -3.12% | 4.77% | 4.36% | 8.95% | -4.09% | 6.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than JAAAX's 2.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JILCX having a 4.09% annualized return and JAAAX not far behind at 4.00%.
JILCX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.09%
JAAAX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JAAAX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JILCX vs. JAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
JILCX
JAAAX
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILCX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.42 | 1.68 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.15 | 2.25 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.67 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 8.43 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILCX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.68 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.98 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.92 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.84 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILCX and JAAAX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Dividend Comparison
JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than JAAAX's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.42% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.17% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 1.72% | 0.74% | 3.38% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 0.77% | 2.78% |
Drawdowns
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, which is greater than JAAAX's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and JAAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILCX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -15.72% | -7.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.06% | -4.43% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.51% | -6.28% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.51% | -12.64% | -3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -2.02% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -2.06% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.03% | 0.88% | +0.15% |
Volatility
JILCX vs. JAAAX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) at 1.04%. This indicates that JILCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILCX | JAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.04% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 2.72% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.53% | 4.72% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 4.21% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.02% | 4.37% | +0.65% |