PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAAAX vs. ICVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAAAX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's 15.73% return. Over the past 10 years, JAAAX has underperformed ICVT with an annualized return of 4.18%, while ICVT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.


JAAAX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.80%
6M
4.06%
YTD
6.31%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
6.87%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
4.18%
ALL TIME*
5.51%

ICVT

1D
-0.13%
1M
-3.58%
6M
10.12%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
25.68%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$56.37M$69.08M$90.45M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
6.31%6.18%6.59%5.85%-3.12%4.77%4.36%8.95%-4.09%6.10%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
15.73%18.10%10.61%15.35%-20.66%-0.66%61.01%21.76%-0.27%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between JAAAX and ICVT is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2015

0.62

The correlation between JAAAX and ICVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAAAX vs. ICVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAAAX
JAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
ICVT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ICVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ICVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAAAXICVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.25

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

2.08

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.67

7.79

+9.87

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAAX and ICVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAAAX drawdown since its inception was -15.72%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAAX and ICVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAAAXICVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.72%

-33.25%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-11.65%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.66%

-11.65%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.28%

-29.95%

+23.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.64%

-33.25%

+20.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-8.79%

+8.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.03%

-9.43%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

3.11%

-2.55%

Volatility

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) is 1.01%, while iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that JAAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAAAXICVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

6.39%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

14.58%

-11.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

17.19%

-13.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.21%

13.78%

-9.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

15.73%

-11.36%

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAAAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAAAX vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

JAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than ICVT's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
1.29%1.73%2.19%1.85%1.93%7.70%3.98%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%
JAAAX
John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund
1.44%1.53%1.17%1.71%3.02%1.72%0.74%3.38%1.99%1.23%0.77%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAAAX and ICVT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICVT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to JAAAX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAAX dropped -15.72% vs ICVT's -33.25%.

JAAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAAAX and ICVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer