JAAAX vs. PULS

In the year-to-date period, JAAAX achieves a -3.46% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 0.95% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

JAAAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current JAAAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the PULS Sharpe Ratio of 9.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAAAX and PULS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

JAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than PULS's 5.36% yield.

The maximum JAAAX drawdown since its inception was -12.09%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAAX and PULS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) is NaN%, while PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that JAAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.