JHSC vs. SMMD
JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - JHSC tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index while SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.04%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for SMMD. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHSC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SMMD.
Performance
JHSC vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 18.37% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMD
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 36.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
JHSC vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.55% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 18.37% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and SMMD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between JHSC and SMMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHSC vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHSC
SMMD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
JHSC
SMMD
Industrials
JHSC
SMMD
Technology
JHSC
SMMD
Consumer Cyclical
JHSC
SMMD
Energy
JHSC
SMMD
Healthcare
JHSC
SMMD
Real Estate
JHSC
SMMD
Basic Materials
JHSC
SMMD
Utilities
JHSC
SMMD
Consumer Defensive
JHSC
SMMD
Communication Services
JHSC
SMMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
SMMD
JHSC vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHSC | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 3.75 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 14.29 | -5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHSC | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 2.11 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.37 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and SMMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -41.06% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -9.66% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -25.50% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -28.26% | +3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.63% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -8.37% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.53% | +0.25% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 4.16%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 5.17% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 12.58% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 17.20% | -0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 20.82% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 22.37% | -0.16% |
JHSC vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHSC vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than SMMD's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, JHSC and SMMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to JHSC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs SMMD's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.64% vs 7.04% for JHSC. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.
SMMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.01% for JHSC.
JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.15% for SMMD.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHSC and SMMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer