JHSC vs. SCHA
JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHSC returned 7.48%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for SCHA. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JHSC charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
JHSC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHSC achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 22.53% return.
JHSC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 25.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 6M
- 20.00%
- 1Y
- 41.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.72%
JHSC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 13.57% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -12.50% | 4.48% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.53% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHSC and SCHA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between JHSC and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHSC vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHSC
SCHA
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
JHSC
SCHA
Financial Services
JHSC
SCHA
Technology
JHSC
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
JHSC
SCHA
Healthcare
JHSC
SCHA
Real Estate
JHSC
SCHA
Basic Materials
JHSC
SCHA
Energy
JHSC
SCHA
Utilities
JHSC
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
JHSC
SCHA
Communication Services
JHSC
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHSC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
JHSC
SCHA
JHSC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.37 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 4.42 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 16.18 | -7.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHSC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHSC drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHSC and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -42.41% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -9.50% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -27.29% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.21% | -30.79% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -1.72% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -7.56% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 2.59% | +0.18% |
Volatility
JHSC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) is 4.27%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that JHSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHSC | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 6.71% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 13.92% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.35% | 18.77% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 22.05% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 22.75% | -0.57% |
JHSC vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHSC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHSC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than SCHA's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 0.99% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, JHSC and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to JHSC (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHSC dropped -42.66% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 7.48% vs 7.30% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 7.48% return vs 7.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHSC.
JHSC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.98% for SCHA.
JHSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. JHSC tracks John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHSC and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHSC and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer