JHMM vs. QMOM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. JHMM is passively managed, while QMOM is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHMM returned 11.84%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for QMOM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QMOM.

Performance

JHMM vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 13.19% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 24.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JHMM has underperformed QMOM with an annualized return of 11.84%, while QMOM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.78% annualized return.

JHMM

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 13.19%
• 6M: 13.16%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: 11.84%

QMOM

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 24.29%
• 6M: 24.93%
• 1Y: 30.10%
• 3Y*: 23.16%
• 5Y*: 11.48%
• 10Y*: 13.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	13.19%	10.73%	14.61%	14.53%	-15.30%	24.54%	16.22%	30.01%	-9.57%	19.96%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	24.29%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%	-6.99%	-4.06%	61.94%	28.39%	-11.75%	15.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and QMOM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.72

The correlation between JHMM and QMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. QMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JHMM	QMOM
Industrials	19.4%	37.5%
Technology	17.2%	23.9%
Financial Services	15.3%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	7.4%
Healthcare	10.2%	8.9%
Utilities	5.4%	2.0%
Energy	5.4%	5.5%
Real Estate	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	9.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	1.6%
Communication Services	2.7%	4.2%

Return for Risk

JHMM vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 58
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 52
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 65

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 42
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHMM	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.30	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	1.84	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.24	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	2.39	+0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.58	8.74	+2.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHMM vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHMM	QMOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.30	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.48	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.52	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.51	+0.12

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum QMOM drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and QMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMM	QMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-39.13%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-12.65%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-26.46%	+4.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.10%	-26.82%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.71%	-39.13%	-1.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.66%	+0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-12.91%	+7.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	3.45%	-1.22%

Volatility

JHMM vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.71%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMM	QMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	8.27%	-4.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	19.79%	-9.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.09%	23.30%	-9.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	24.19%	-5.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.60%	26.48%	-6.88%

JHMM vs. QMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than QMOM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMM vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than QMOM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.86%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.44%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMM and QMOM in my portfolio?

JHMM and QMOM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHMM or QMOM?

QMOM has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to JHMM (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

Which ETF is better, JHMM or QMOM?

On 10-year performance, QMOM leads with 13.78% vs 11.84% for JHMM. On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHMM or QMOM?

Over the 10-year period, QMOM has performed better with a 13.78% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMM or QMOM?

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMM or QMOM?

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.44% for QMOM.

What is the main difference between JHMM and QMOM?

JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while QMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.28% for QMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.