PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHML vs. VSDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHML vs. VSDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than VSDA's 4.72% return.


JHML

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.79%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.80%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.24%

VSDA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
4.63%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHML vs. VSDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
11.62%15.91%19.84%21.16%-15.94%26.90%17.02%30.94%-6.45%15.57%
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
4.72%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%12.72%31.39%-1.40%14.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JHML and VSDA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.76

The correlation between JHML and VSDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHML vs. VSDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHML
VSDA

Technology

27.8%
4.7%

Financial Services

13.8%
21.0%

Industrials

12.2%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
5.1%

Healthcare

9.0%
7.6%

Communication Services

8.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
31.5%

Energy

4.3%
2.5%

Utilities

4.0%
2.7%

Basic Materials

2.8%
8.0%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.0%

Technology

JHML
27.8%
VSDA
4.7%

Financial Services

JHML
13.8%
VSDA
21.0%

Industrials

JHML
12.2%
VSDA
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JHML
10.3%
VSDA
5.1%

Healthcare

JHML
9.0%
VSDA
7.6%

Communication Services

JHML
8.4%
VSDA
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

JHML
5.1%
VSDA
31.5%

Energy

JHML
4.3%
VSDA
2.5%

Utilities

JHML
4.0%
VSDA
2.7%

Basic Materials

JHML
2.8%
VSDA
8.0%

Real Estate

JHML
2.4%
VSDA
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHML vs. VSDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHML
JHML Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHML vs. VSDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMLVSDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.16

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

1.11

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

2.84

+12.76

JHML vs. VSDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHML Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the VSDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHML and VSDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMLVSDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

0.93

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.66

+0.15

Drawdowns

JHML vs. VSDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than VSDA's maximum drawdown of -32.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and VSDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMLVSDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-32.12%

-4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-9.44%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-15.54%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-16.14%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-6.28%

+5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-3.64%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

3.67%

-1.96%

Volatility

JHML vs. VSDA - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMLVSDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.84%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

8.12%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

11.23%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

14.03%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

16.59%

+1.17%

JHML vs. VSDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VSDA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHML vs. VSDA - Dividend Comparison

JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than VSDA's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
0.95%1.06%1.16%1.39%1.46%1.08%1.59%1.73%1.57%1.44%1.36%0.38%
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.61%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHML and VSDA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSDA has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs VSDA's -32.12%.

On 5-year performance, JHML leads with 11.88% vs 6.69% for VSDA. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHML has performed better with a 11.88% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSDA.

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.95% for JHML.

JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.35% for VSDA.

JHML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHML and VSDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer